Voters still haven’t gone to the ballot box, but the four great losers of the Jan. 14 elections are already appearing.
The biggest loser is Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如). Holding a doctorate from the University of Chicago, she has always succeeded in everything she does. With such a good background, one wonders why she had to get involved in crooked, underhanded political attacks by attempting to frame opponents using forged documents. It is all too clear that she has ulterior motives and in an instant, she has destroyed the good reputation and goodwill she has spent a lifetime building.
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and his wife, Tsai Ling-yi (蔡令怡), are the second-biggest losers. Wu is a liar who has a way with words that allows him to cover up mistakes. This time around he has claimed that the dates on the forged Yu Chang documents are not important. For someone who claims to be a student of history and who has worked as a reporter to say something like that is a sign of maliciousness and ill intent.
When Tsai Ling-yi made her fabricated and inflammatory statements that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had “moved NT$1.1 billion [US$36.34 million] of the nation’s money to her family business,” Wu said that “there are some grounds” for that statement, and promptly inflated the sum to NT$1.4 billion.
It is as if it were an auction of thieves: Buy one, get one free. A man who keeps telling lies with a stern, angry face clearly does not make a very good impression, and the loyal deep-blue supporters may now be longing for Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長). At least he always has a smile on his face that would not lose him any points.
The third losers are the newspapers that have taken money from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration to write reports and commentary based on the government’s advertising copy.
The government’s abuse of the executive, legislative and judicial branches and now its possible use of the Control Yuan to fabricate the Yu Chang controversy is even more vicious than the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration’s fabrication of the accusations used to frame General Sun Li-jen (孫立人) when he became too powerful in the 1950s and political dissident Lei Chen (雷震) in the 1960s.
These newspapers care nothing for the principles of neutrality and objectivity. They have sold their souls and destroyed their credibility and the value of their own existence.
The fourth loser is the Special Investigation Division (SID). The division sat idly by and watched while Ma and his government were suspected of illegal activities and abuse of power without investigating the claims, in effect turning the division into a political tool to destroy judicial neutrality.
Just as everyone was utterly baffled when Ma started telling stories about how he mends his clothes and resoles his shoes to show how thrifty he is, I don’t think anyone could have ever dreamed that he would be relying on such people to win re-election.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
The Presidential Office on Saturday reiterated that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation after US President Donald Trump said that Taiwan should not “go independent.” “We’re not looking to have somebody say: ‘Let’s go independence because the United States is backing us,’” Trump said in an interview with Fox News aired on Friday. President William Lai (賴清德) on Monday said that the Republic of China (ROC) — Taiwan’s official name — and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are not subordinate to each other. Speaking at an event marking the 40th anniversary of the establishment of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Lai said
RSS