President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) touts himself as being thrifty — as vouched for by his long-time barber and a cobbler, who in a recent campaign advertisement extolled Ma’s thriftiness.
In the TV spot, the barber described Ma as an easy customer who never makes special demands on how he’d like his hair styled.
The cobbler spoke of Ma’s frugality, saying he has been patching Ma’s worn-out shoes for more than two decades, adding that he had repaired some of Ma’s shoes five or six times, and that he had also repaired Ma’s swimming trunks.
Being thrifty is indeed a virtue, so the campaign ad was designed to depict Ma as a politician who does not waste money and is down-to-earth.
However, when politicians are portrayed as overly virtuous and eulogized by certain media outlets, they tend to strike the wrong chord with voters.
How often does one hear stories of a person wearing the same suit for 10 years and using the same blanket for 34 years, as Ma recently claimed on his Facebook page?
Any ordinary person would have at least two suits to alternate, or more for people who are better off, not to mention Ma, who — according to a report on the assets of public figures released by the Control Yuan in March — has bank deposits of NT$70.62 million (US$2.33 million), among other assets.
Is there really a need for a person of Ma’s affluence and status to propagandize compliments on his thriftiness?
However, after spending NT$215 million (US$7.1 million) to produce a two-night run of the rock musical Dreamers and millions more on fireworks to celebrate the Republic of China’s centennial, as well as NT$10 billion on the Taipei International Flora Expo, it appears the Ma administration is not quite so thrifty when it comes to spending taxpayers’ money.
The president made that clear last month when he footed the bill — using money from the state affairs fund, not from his own pocket — for a purchase of about 5 tonnes of persimmons, ostensibly to help the ailing agricultural industry.
Ma’s so-called “thriftiness” is selective: He is a penny-pincher when it comes to spending his own money, but a spendthrift when it comes to taxpayers’ money.
Moreover, despite the nation’s financial plight, the Presidential Office, saying it needed to give the president “more space to help the disadvantaged,” increased his discretionary fund from NT$30 million to NT$40 million a year after he was inaugurated.
With Ma’s support rates slumping according to several recent media polls, it appears the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has launched yet another campaign aimed at eulogizing Ma’s thrifty traits.
The Taiwanese public does not care how many old pairs of shoes the president repairs and swimming trunks he has patched; what people care about is whether Ma, as a national leader, has what it takes to give them a better standard of living.
And how brazen is Ma’s re-election campaign office to paint the president as being frugal when the nation’s debt has doubled from NT$1.2 trillion when the Democratic Progressive Party governmnet left office in 2008 to NT$2.4 trillion three years later?
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS