Population growth, the increasing consumption of a global elite and an international legal system skewed in favor of large-scale investors are fueling a worldwide rush for land that is unfolding faster than previously thought and is likely to continue, according to the largest study of international land deals to date.
Researchers estimate that more than 200 million hectares of land have been sold or leased between 2000 and last year. However, although the food price crisis of 2007-2008 may have triggered a boom in international land deals, the study says that a much broader set of factors — linked to population growth and the rise of emerging economies — is raising the prospect of “a new era in the struggle for, and control over, land in many areas of the global south.”
Forty civil society and research groups fed into the global commercial pressures on land research project, coordinated by the International Land Coalition (ILC), which draws on a decade of data to identify and analyze trends in large land acquisitions and highlights the role of governments in brokering deals that may marginalize rural communities and jeopardize the future of family farming in favor of big industrial projects. This is the most comprehensive study to date of international land deals, pulling together findings from investigations around the world.
Over the last year a number of reports have focused on cases of foreign investors “grabbing” large tracts of land in poor African countries to grow cheap food for their own populations. However, according to a study published by the ILC on Wednesday, rich national investors play a much larger role than previously thought, food is not the main focus of these deals and African governments are not the only ones signing away large tracts of land.
Data collected by researchers show that about 40 percent of land acquired over the last decade is intended for biofuel production. In comparison, 25 percent is for food crops and another 27 percent for mining, tourism, industry and forestry. However, the focus of land deals also varies by region: In Africa, 66 percent of land deals cross-referenced by researchers are intended for biofuel production, compared with 15 percent for food crops. Meanwhile, food production seems more significant in Latin America (27 percent), along with mineral extraction (23 percent).
The report also notes that regional dealings may be on the rise: In Southeast Asia, for example, 75 percent of reported land deals have been struck by regional players and South African investors have acquired an estimated 40.7 million hectares of African land since 2009. The full data from the Land Matrix research project will be published next year.
Though policymakers seem to have recently warmed to the potential role of family farms, the report says enthusiasm for industrial-scale agriculture continues to sideline small farmers.
Many developing countries, under pressure from the IMF, the World Bank and a number of government aid agencies, are going to great lengths to attract and legally protect foreign investment in agriculture and extractive industries, setting up sophisticated specialized agencies to promote investment opportunities and offering benefits such as tax breaks and low prices, the ILC said.
Last week, the US aid agency USAid hosted an international conference to promote foreign investment in South Sudan. Research by the US-based Oakland Institute suggests that almost 9 percent of South Sudan’s land had already been leased or bought by investors prior to the country’s independence in July.
Wednesday’s study says that international trade regimes are overwhelmingly skewed in favor of international investors, while fewer and less effective international mechanisms exist to safeguard the rights of the rural poor. Meanwhile, the common lack of formal, legal titles to land is heightening the vulnerability of rural communities.
“As governments own the land, it is easy for them to lease large areas to investors, but the benefits for local communities or national treasuries are often minimal,” said Lorenzo Cotula, of the London-based International Institute for Environment and Development. “This highlights the need for poor communities to have stronger rights over the land they have lived on for generations.”
Last year, the G20 summit in Seoul encouraged all countries and companies to uphold a set of principles for responsible agricultural investment, developed by the UN and the World Bank. However, critics say that voluntary international agreements can amount to little more than window-dressing. Earlier this year, African leaders gathered in Lusaka, Zambia, to discuss ways to regulate land-based foreign direct investment.
Resistance to large land deals is growing. In August, residents of Mukaya Payam, in South Sudan’s Central Equatoria state, launched a campaign against what would have been the country’s largest land deal — a 49-year lease of 600,000 hectares by a US company. Last month, hundreds of smallholder farmers and civil society activists converged on Selingue, in southern Mali, for the first international farmers’ conference to tackle the global rush for land.
“Optimistically, it may even be hoped that rural communities in many parts of the world are able to finally achieve secure access to and control over their land through struggles catalysed by the increasing demand for it. It is to be hoped that the rush for land will act as a wake-up call, provoking a reconsideration of the path we are on,” the ILC says.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the