Taiwan’s presidential elections have always been influenced by external elements, namely China and the US. Even if Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) runs on issues such as social justice, the widening gap between rich and poor and the worsening economy, cross-strait relations can never be overlooked.
Prior to the first debate, Tsai pledged to establish a special task force to engage in dialogue with China if she won the election, as well as invite the new legislative speaker and leaders of different political parties to reach a domestic consensus on dealing with China.
Before she unveiled her so-called “Ten year policy platform” in August, Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office made a series of moves to force her to accept some form of “one China” framework. Taiwan Affairs Office Chairman Wang Yi (王毅) revealed the scheme to US academics during his trip to Washington in July. The office also sent the same message to Tsai’s camp via Taiwanese academics close to the pan-green camp. Nevertheless, the Chinese were upset by Tsai’s reluctance to accept the “one China” framework.
Wang later warned Tsai of the consequences of not accepting the so-called “1992 consensus.” Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) also reiterated the need for the DPP to acknowledge the “1992 consensus” to ensure future cross-strait dialogue when he met President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) special envoy Lien Chan (連戰) at the APEC summit.
Thought most pundits say Beijing will not make any concession on the “1992 consensus,” communication between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the DPP has been frequent in the past two years. Beijing has not ruled out discussing an alternative framework with Tsai.
China is well-known for its insistence on certain “frameworks.” Despite Beijing being dissatisfied with Ma’s notion of “one China with individual interpretations,” it continues to deal with the Ma administration under the “one China” framework — defined by Beijing as the People’s Republic of China.
Since Tsai has expressed her intention to set up a task force for negotiating with Beijing if she wins the election and pledged to establish a bipartisan mechanism to generate a “Taiwan consensus,” Beijing’s main concerns are how formal and how authoritative the task force would be. China would also consider the margin of Tsai’s possible electoral victory when deciding whether to open dialogue with her.
US President Barack Obama’s administration has also pressured Tsai.
During her visit to Washington in September, a Financial Times story quoted an anonymous senior US official who attended a meeting with Tsai as saying that “she left us with distinct doubts about whether she is both willing and able to continue the stability in cross-strait relations the region has enjoyed in recent years.”
Although the US State Department immediately disavowed the comment, it showed Washington’s concerns over Tsai.
It is therefore understandable that Tsai would introduce a mechanism for reaching her “Taiwan consensus” in a clearer way. Facing Washington’s calls to make aggressive moves toward Beijing’s insistence on adhering to the “1992 consensus,” Tsai has demonstrated a more prudent attitude and stressed the need for a -consensus-building process.
Finally, Beijing has its own leadership succession next year, so no major policy change toward Taiwan can be predicted. A victory for Tsai would no doubt complicate Beijing’s reactions. It would require patience and wisdom from Tsai and her team to face the pressures from both Beijing and Washington.
Liu Shih-chung is a senior research fellow at the Taipei-based Taiwan Brain Trust.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US