All the signs suggest that Taiwan’s economy, under the stewardship of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), is on the brink of collapse. The TAIEX has been behaving particularly strangely, as if trying to tell us something.
It fell by almost 100 points soon after opening last Thursday, despite no significant bad news from around the world that would precipitate such an adverse reaction. By closing, it had recovered to 6,982 points, which, while an improvement, still represented a fall of 50.1 points, or 0.71 percent. Compared with other Asian markets — South Korea sliding 5.03 points (0.37 percent); Japan falling 57.59 points (0.66 percent); the Philippines down 2.28 points (0.05 percent) — the TAIEX was again the weakest in East Asia.
The vulnerability of the TAIEX has been apparent over the past couple of months compared with other East Asian exchanges’ performances after they all hit a low on Sept. 26 — the height of the EU debt crisis. While the TAIEX has recovered by only 1.5 percent (increasing from 6,877.12 to 6,982.90), South Korea’s market has recovered by 15.7 percent, the Philippines’ by 15.9 percent and Thailand’s by 16.1 percent. Even Japan recovered by 3.5 percent.
The comparison makes for uncomfortable reading. Of all the East Asian stock markets’ poor showing in the wake of the European debt crisis, then, Taiwan’s has fared the worst.
The problem is even starker if one looks at it in terms of Ma’s time in office. On May 19, 2008, before he took office, the TAIEX stood at 9,295 points. Yesterday, it closed at 6,922.57. Far from being able to show any discernible progress, the past four years have actually seen a drop of 25.5 percent in the stock market. In the same period, South Korea’s stock market has risen by 1.4 percent, the Philippines’ by 49.88 percent and Thailand’s by 20.56 percent, while Indonesia’s market showed the most impressive increase, 50.34 percent.
The government can no longer point to the 2008 financial crisis to explain this state of affairs. The problem clearly has more to do with how Ma’s team is governing the country and the direction in which they are taking it.
Taiwan’s economic monitoring and leading indicators have been falling for 20 consecutive months, with the monitoring indicators starting to flash “yellow-blue” on the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research’s scale, suggesting that the economy is approaching a slowdown. In October the money supply measure in the market exhibited a black cross, which might lead to a temporary shortage of capital. The TAIEX’s poor performance last Thursday seems to be telling us that the overall economic framework has finally had enough, after three years of engaging with China according to policy and the magnetic effect of the market over there. These factors have led to the hollowing out of industry and the possibility of economic collapse.
Faced with these warning signals, what is the government, at this precise point in time, thinking? Perhaps it is intentionally suppressing the economy as the year closes, holding out for a sudden prodigious bounce-back in the stock market in the two weeks preceding the presidential election. The impressive figures would simply show a significant improvement in relation to an initially dire situation.
It would not be the first time the KMT government has resorted to such measures. It would be a repeat performance of last year’s miraculous economic growth rate of 10.72 percent, when in fact the average GDP for the previous three years had only been 3.21 percent. The 10.72 percent growth was compared with a low starting point. This was done to pull the wool over the eyes of the electorate. The question is, are voters going to fall for it?
Huang Tien-lin is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US