Now that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has pressed charges against Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如) and several Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers for their accusations that DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was guilty of wrongdoing in the government’s 2007 investment in a biotechnology startup, the presidential campaigns need to shift their focus back to the issues that are actually close to voters’ hearts.
During the past few days, the public has been subject to yet another mudslinging campaign initiated by KMT lawmakers, with high-ranking Executive Yuan officials bickering about the procedural steps surrounding the startup of Yu Chang Biologics Co (now known as TaiMed Biologic Co) and Tsai’s involvement in her capacity as vice premier at the time. This has left many people asking: “What is this Yu Chang case and why are the details surrounding it important to me?”
While it was necessary for Tsai and the DPP to respond to the initial allegation — which put Tsai’s reputation on the line — and defend her integrity, it is time for the DPP as well as the KMT to put this issue aside and avoid any more mudslinging over the Yu Chang case.
After all, the truth is that the case does not affect voters’ daily lives. There are far more important and urgent issues that the public is concerned with. People throughout the nation are waiting for the presidential candidates to provide solid details about their policy platforms so that they can make an informed decision about who is most deserving of their vote on Jan. 14 and who will lead the nation toward a more promising future.
For example, many people are concerned about the rise in already high real-estate prices. Many voters, especially young adults and newlyweds, are feeling the financial pressure and find themselves unable to afford housing because of the continued appreciation in property values. What solutions are the candidates proposing for this major problem?
Unemployment and underemployment also remain real issues for many Taiwanese, not to mention workers’ fears about the increasing practice of companies asking their employees to take unpaid leave. How do the candidates propose to fix these problems?
As politicians engage in silly-season fights over non-issues and take turns jabbing at each other in the media, many Taiwanese remain victims of the nation’s high unemployment rate, unequal distribution of wealth and government resources, as well as the problematic judicial system that fails to adequately protect human rights.
And what are the presidential candidates’ long-term agricultural policies? After all, there is more to the nation’s agricultural problems than plummeting persimmon prices. Supply and demand imbalances have existed for a long time and now other products, such as ginger, have also begun to experience such problems — and then there are the issues of food security and self-sufficiency.
Most important, however, is that voters are still waiting for the presidential candidates to outline their visions of how to develop the nation and equip the people in Taiwan with more national pride so that they would have the guts and determination to stand up for their nation’s sovereignty and dignity in an effort to create more international space for Taiwan in the face of China’s constant pressure.
The public is still waiting for the candidates to present their visions and solutions to all of these problems, and at the end of the day, these are the issues that will truly matter to the voters come Jan. 14 when they cast their ballots.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS