During the presidential debate on Saturday last week, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) quoted a whole load of figures.
The first thing to say about these numbers is that Taiwan’s average annual economic growth rate during Ma’s tenure up to now has been a mere 3.24 percent — much lower than the 4.4 percent average during the eight years in which the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) held the reins of government.
Meanwhile, South Korea’s lead over Taiwan in GDP per capita grew on average from US$1,754 in 2008 to US$2,467 last year. One of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) favorite slogans used to be: “If South Korea can do it, why can’t Taiwan?” Nowadays, perhaps we should be saying “[South Korean President] Lee Myung-bak can do it, but Ma Ying-jeou really can’t.”
The second point is that the average unemployment rate of 5.1 percent during Ma’s tenure is higher than the 4.2 percent average during the DPP’s eight years in government.
And then there is the fact that most people in employment now are either threatened with forced unpaid leave or are in atypical employment, not to mention that wages have fallen back to the levels of 13 years ago in real terms.
Foreign direct investment, the best indicator of an economy’s competitiveness, slid from a peak of US$15.4 billion in 2007 to a new low of US$3.8 billion last year.
Evidently, talk of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) attracting overseas investment is as fallacious as the promise that Taiwan’s stock index would attain the 20,000-point mark.
Let us also consider how disadvantaged groups are faring.
During the three-and-a-half years of Ma’s administration, the hardship index (unemployment plus inflation) has reached 6.28 percent, compared with 5.15 percent during the DPP’s eight years in office — a difference of more than 1 percent.
The total number of low to medium-income households has risen by 23,755 since 2008, compared with the rise of 24,215 between 2000 and 2007. Ma has been in office for less than four years, but the increase in the number of such households in this time is equal to the increase in the whole eight years of DPP administration.
Now let’s look at the average annual income of farmers’ households. In 2007, it was NT$937,000, but by last year it had fallen to NT$885,000. Recently, the KMT legislative caucus spent an excessive amount of money on advertisements declaring how well Taiwanese agricultural products were selling overseas.
It does make one wonder — if they are really all that caring — why it is that farmers’ incomes are not increasing and are, on the contrary, falling?
Finally, there is the way cross-strait relations are developing.
Ma relies so much on China economically and in terms of foreign relations, it’s difficult for the government not to cede ground in political matters in return. It won’t be long before cross-strait talks will be based not on equal status and mutual respect, but solely on the “one China” principle, with none of the “each side having its own interpretation” of the so-called “1992 consensus,” either.
Now that Europe is in the grip of a severe sovereign debt crisis, Taiwanese industry is in decline and China continues to rise, Taiwan is sure to be faced with some very difficult challenges.
Ma truly thinks he is doing a superb job, but the truth is that he is incompetent and not above telling untruths to conceal that fact.
The first thing Taiwan needs to do is to replace him.
Huang Tzu-wei is a researcher at Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Julian Clegg and Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US