On Nov. 27, People First Party (PFP) vice presidential candidate Lin Ruey-shiung (林瑞雄) pledged at a rally in Sinying District (新營), Greater Tainan, to establish a new university in the district, because “there is no good university there.” The PFP’s education policy is completely wrong and absolutely unacceptable.
The large number of universities in Taiwan has long been a target of criticism. Under former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) policy of “one university for each county,” the number of universities has grown in the past decade. Today, there are 163 colleges and universities nationwide, and with the birthrate declining, some schools can barely recruit enough students. Greater Tainan, for one, has 16 colleges and universities, including some prestigious schools such as National Cheng Kung University. Instead of proposing “one university for each district,” which is even worse than Chen’s policy, the PFP should focus on improving the quality of education at existing schools to win the public’s trust.
In mid-August, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) unveiled her 10-Year Policy Platform for government, including her education policy. Her policy does not differ much from that of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). However, her proposal to raise the percentage of public university students to more than 50 percent is unrealistic, and her suggestion that schools recruit local senior-high graduates first is unfeasible.
A major problem of Taiwan’s higher education system is the uneven distribution of resources between public and private universities. Increasing the number of students enrolled in public schools would not solve the problem. Public universities and students have long enjoyed more educational resources, while private schools and students have been treated like second-class citizens.
For example, among the 12 universities funded by the Ministry of Education’s “university advancement project,” only one, Chang Gung University, is a private school. Tsai’s policy will only widen the gap between public and private universities. Besides, what are her standards for school enrolment? What will happen to schools and students being left behind? The massive budget required to carry out such a policy might lead to a “crowding-out effect.”
As for schools recruiting local senior-high graduates first, what will motivate students to study harder if they could enter a top university just by moving close to one? What about low-income households that cannot afford to move?
As for the KMT’s education policy, even President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has criticized the ministry’s poor promotion of the education system, saying that no one knows what the ministry is doing.
The most serious problem with the current system is the university evaluation system, which forces teachers to focus on research rather than teaching. According to Shih Hsin University President Lai Ting-ming (賴鼎銘), eight of the school’s professors have died from pressure and overwork in the past few years. Lai said most teachers had been forced to spend more time on research and less on teaching to meet the evaluation requirements. Is this the education that we want?
Taiwan needs to improve the quality of existing universities, not build more universities. It needs a fair distribution of educational resources, not more public schools or students. It also needs a more flexible evaluation system and to achieve a balance between research and teaching. As the presidential election is more than a month away, hopefully, the three parties can adjust their education policies and come up with some “beef.”
Chang Sheng-en is a lecturer in the Department of English at Shih Hsin University.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US