KMT’s baseless claims
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) campaigned in 2008 on a claim that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had run the economy into a ditch, that closer links with the fast-growing Chinese economy were necessary and that the KMT could deliver them.
The fact is that annual GDP growth in Taiwan during the DPP administration averaged about 5 percent. It is true that this was little more than half the growth rate in China, but it was higher than almost any other developed country in the world. Not bad when you consider that practically all DPP-proposed reforms were sabotaged by a KMT-dominated legislature.
And what about trade? Taiwanese exports to China (excluding Hong Kong and transit trade), which was practically nil in 1999, grew by an annual average of US$7 billion until 2007, reaching US$58.5 billion that year. By 2008, total Taiwanese investments in China had probably reached about US$150 billion, more than investments from any other country, creating possibly as many as 50 million jobs and generating 15 percent of Chinese exports.
Though the DPP was and is much reviled by China, the growth in economic exchanges was fast and extensive on its watch. Since then, the pace has slowed dramatically. This may be a good thing, since Taiwan was becoming quite exposed because of its heavy economic engagement with China, but it is not what the KMT promised in 2008.
The KMT has also been unable to keep its promise to deliver stronger GDP growth. While this can partly be blamed on troubled export markets and rising energy prices, it was totally improbable to begin with to think that even closer ties with China would improve the already high growth rates in Taiwan.
Klaus Carsten Pedersen
Director, Danish Foreign Policy Society
Copenhagen, Denmark
Election monitoring essential
It is disappointing to see that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has not provided funding to European academics to observe next month’s presidential and legislative elections (“European election observers denied funding by MOFA,” Dec. 2, page 1).
The elections should be an opportunity to showcase Taiwan’s democratic development to the rest of the world.
DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has a good chance of winning the election. If Tsai is victorious, it will mark another transition of power and solidify Taiwan’s transition to democracy that began with the lifting of martial law in 1987.
However, one hopes the transition will be smooth and trouble-free. A look at Taiwan’s recent history suggests the possibility of trouble.
KMT supporters were engaged in violent protests following the election victories of Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) as president in 2000 and 2004. KMT Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅) even served time in jail for his role in leading a riot in Kaohsiung after the 2004 election.
The four-month transition period between next year’s presidential election and the swearing-in of the president is a window during which more trouble could potentially occur.
It is pleasing to the see the formation of an international committee, led by eminent figures that include former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and former presidential adviser Peng Ming-min (彭明敏), to observe the election (“US Congress to watch elections ‘closely,’” Dec. 3, page 1).
I hope that their efforts to ensure that the election is free and fair will also be supported by NGOs such as the Carter Center and Asian Network for Free Elections.
It is also important that as many foreign academics and media personnel as possible are in Taiwan at the time of the election to closely monitor the situation.
The presence of foreign observers during the election will help ensure that the democratic gains made in Taiwan during the past two decades are not put at risk.
David Reid
Taradale, Australia
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US