Several days ago Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative candidate Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) said a vote for People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) was a vote for Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) campaign is clearly worried and regards Soong’s candidacy as dangerous.
Soong is marketing himself as being above the pan-blue/pan-green divide, but in reality his support comes mostly from pan-blue voters, something he is well aware of and working to exploit to the full. Whereas the KMT is abandoning its traditional base, Soong is digging deep into the foundations of pan-blue support. It is against this background that the fight within the pan-blue camp rages.
Soong registered as a presidential candidate on Thursday morning last week. In the afternoon, Ma went to the Touliao Mausoleum, where former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) is buried, to “report to Chiang.”
This was a transparent ploy to appeal to pan-blue supporters, to highlight that it is Ma who subscribes to KMT orthodoxy and not Soong. He then had an interview with the BBC, in which he played the unification card. It goes without saying that Soong is sidling up to the deep-blues.
If one is to believe the PFP, Soong appeals to moderate or light blue and green voters, and so he needs to tread carefully when discussing unification and independence. Why is it so difficult for Ma to convince people to give him a second crack of the whip? Incompetence is one, but the main reason is most people reject the idea of eventual unification.
Numerous opinion polls indicate that Ma’s support started to dip after Oct. 17, when he announced a possible peace accord with China. He promptly corrected himself, but the damage was already done. Soong, as cunning as ever, used this moment to show his pro-unification colors, gunning for the pan-blue vote.
That Soong is now in a strong position is not so much because of his own ability as Ma’s incompetence. After four years of Ma, the public has had enough. Soong now has the chance to draw his sword once more, but whether he is able to inflict a mortal wound on Ma depends on how much vitriol and personal attacks the pan-blue pro-unification media subject him to.
How many votes can Soong get? Nobody in their right mind would bet on the outcome, but the point is not how many of Ma’s votes he can steal: He might not damage Ma’s election prospects, but his only concern is to be able to compete against Ma. The Jan. 14 presidential election will offer a standard by which to measure his success in this. It is often said it is the journey, not the arriving, that matters, and so it is with Soong’s election bid.
Given that Soong’s votes will basically come from pan-blue supporters, it makes sense for him to attack Ma. Based on press reports, Soong is laying into Ma 80 percent of the time and Tsai only 20 percent, in tune with his election strategy. Comparing his own strong record as former Taiwan governor with Ma’s poor performance as president adds weight to Tsai’s own criticisms of Ma, and consolidates the general impression of Ma’s shortcomings. This is far more effective than taking Tsai on.
Soong’s entrance has also drawn the brunt of attacks from the pan-blue press away from Tsai and onto Soong, particularly in the case of the political call-in programs. The pan-blue camp seems to be making an art form out of infighting.
As things start to look bad for Ma, the pan-blue camp is trying to cast Soong as a “sinner,” but this is not entirely fair. The real “sinner” of the pan-blue camp is Ma, not Soong. He has only himself to blame.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US