I haven’t seen the “American Footsteps in Taiwan, 1950-1980” exhibition currently on display at the National 228 Memorial Museum. According to a Central News Agency report: “The exhibition, organized by the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), shows the influence the US has had in the development of Taiwan’s economy, education, military forces and public health.” (“Exhibition shows the US’ influence in martial-law Taiwan,” Nov. 27, page 2).
Nothing I read in the article suggests acknowledgement by the sponsors of the US’ role in a “conspiracy of silence” about White Terror in the period being celebrated by the display. If that is true, it would be a mockery to house it at the National 228 Memorial Museum.
Since martial law ended in 1987, many have documented in horrifying detail the corruption and brutality of the one-party state. At the time, Americans seemed to know much more about the atrocities of “Red Terror” in China and almost nothing about “White Terror” in Taiwan. How could that be?
China was closed to the US and many other countries. Taiwan, on the other hand, was awash in Americans: missionaries, students, teachers, US Department of State personnel, businesspeople and tourists. How could so many of these not have known? How was it that Americans in general knew so much about atrocities in China and so little about them in Taiwan?
Many people didn’t know what was happening in Taiwan because of what I call “a conspiracy of silence” between Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) administration and the US government. And it was not difficult to pull off. After World War II when Chiang and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost the civil war to Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Chinese Communist Party in China, Americans were incredulous. How could it have happened? There were a few voices who reported the corruption and brutality of Chiang and the KMT, but their voices were lost in the deafening crescendo of anti-communism in the US.
Years later in Taiwan, mission boards and their missionaries were reluctant to talk about what they knew because to do so would threaten their mission. Some US universities tried to silence their postgraduate students because if they got into political trouble, it would threaten their being able to send more students to Taiwan, at the time the best place to study Mandarin Chinese. The conspiracy wasn’t centrally directed; it didn’t have to be.
Anti-communism justified the US’ decision to look the other way when it came to White Terror. The myth of Taiwan as “Free China” legitimized the partnership. And most Americans bought the myth; few understood that in the eyes of most Taiwanese, Taiwan was neither “free” nor was it “China.”
The sheer number of cases of arrest without trial, torture, secret trials and executions are mind-numbing. What happened to friends, even after 40 years, is painful to recall. Hsieh Tsung-min (謝聰敏) and Wei Ting-chao (魏廷朝) were friends arrested on Feb. 23, 1971, a week before my former wife and I were. The difference between their punishment and ours was that, as US citizens, we were put under house arrest and then expelled, while Hsieh and Wei were tortured and given long prison sentences.
During the time of his imprisonment, Hsieh managed to smuggle a letter out of prison. This one got as far as the US Navy Post at the American Navy Medical Study Center behind the hospital at National Taiwan University. US Naval security intercepted Hsieh’s letter and saw that it was from a political prisoner. They turned the letter over to the chief of the general staff, which resulted in torture so severe that Hsieh almost didn’t survive. Years later, in his paper on “White Terror,” Hsieh told this story to remind his readers “that the US Navy not only patrolled the Taiwan Strait for Taiwanese security, but also defended Chiang Kai-shek’s martial law rule.”
I wonder if Hsieh’s or others’ stories of US complicity in the White Terror are told in the display. It should be because celebrating the good things done in Taiwan by the US without mentioning the dark underside of the US-Republic of China relationship is a little like celebrating all of the good things US university Penn State has done over the years without mentioning the role played by the university’s leadership in protecting an alleged child molester for a decade or more. This university has apparently decided that the only way it can regain the trust it once enjoyed is by full disclosure of all that it failed to do and be. I would like to think that is what the US government will do to regain the trust of the Taiwanese people.
Milo Thornberry is author of Fireproof Moth: A Missionary in Taiwan’s White Terror.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS