The death knell for conservative rule is getting louder by the day in South Korea, where voters are rejecting the big-business-friendly policies of the government and demand a fairer share of the country’s growing wealth.
The Grand National Party’s (GNP) dramatic fall from grace in Asia’s fourth-largest economy raises the prospect of a shift in policy to a more welfare-oriented system, as well as change in its North Korea strategy and shift in ties with Washington.
The popular vote is not going to a rival left-leaning party, rather to so-called “people candidates” — high-profile civilians with no political affiliation. Local media has cast this as a vote of no-confidence in the political establishment.
Less than six months before South Korea elects a new parliament and just over a year out from a presidential poll, the conservatives last week suffered their second big by-election loss this year, mirroring opinion polls, which show it is in serious trouble.
In last week’s vote for the mayor of Seoul — the country’s capital and the largest constituency — the GNP was cast out of office for the first time in nearly a decade.
An analysis of the results translates into the GNP losing about 30 seats in the 299-seat South Korean National Assembly, which signals an end to its majority rule. Moreover, no president has ever won office without carrying Seoul.
However, the GNP is not alone in losing favor with the electorate. The main opposition Democratic Party failed even to make it through to the two-way run-off for Seoul mayor.
Analysts say young and working-class voters are tired of both of the country’s largest parties.
“Most of the votes in this election could be labeled as the vote against the establishment, voicing the need for change in the current politics, hence the clear loser of the election would be the GNP,” Hyun Jae-ho of Korea University said.
While the Democrats themselves do not pose a direct threat in the general election, surveys show that if the left pool their vote in an alliance of liberal, or so-called “progressive” parties, they could end GNP majority rule in parliament.
“This election showed the strength of the civic groups in politics, but the problem is whether there are enough star players from civic groups who can act as the face of the people like Park [Won-soon] was for the mayor election,” Woo Jung-yup of the Asian Institute for Policy Studies said.
In the lead of the anti-establishment movement are the winner in the Seoul mayoral race: Park, a human rights lawyer and anti-corruption campaigner, and software mogul-turned university professor Ahn Cheol-soo. Both men’s politics lean to the left.
Opinion polls show Ahn has bolted from the blue to emerge as the frontrunner for next year’s presidential election, even though he has stated he has no interest in running. Analysts say there is a good chance he will change his mind given the current mood in the electorate.
Now, for the second time this year, the conservatives are bracing for a leadership shakeup amid criticism that they are out of touch with ordinary voters. Analysts say voters are angry that while the national wealth has grown, their share has dwindled.
“A deaf and dumb GNP” screamed the headline of an editorial in the conservative Korean JoongAng Daily, which lashed out at the party for tolerating corruption, intransigence and self-indulgence.
If the GNP was shown a yellow card for its crushing defeats in an April by-election, it deserves a red card for failing to rectify its problems by the time of the Seoul vote, it said.
Young voters who propelled South Korean President Lee Myung-bak into the Blue House in 2008, turned their backs on the president and his party in last week’s vote, with more than two-thirds of them voting against the GNP’s candidate in Seoul.
Rising college fees, jobs and the government’s inability to improve the lives of average citizens were among the main reasons given for their anti-government vote.
Even as South Korea grows economically, mainly as a result of the earnings of its conglomerates — or chaebol — the middle and working classes say they are seeing nothing of the profits. To the contrary, they argue inflation and stagnant wages mean they are losing out.
Hyun says the party simply must strive to become more “people friendly” as opposed to “business friendly.”
“Although the economic environment for the corporations and the businesses in Korea is great, the economic situation for small business and the low middle class has been at its worst in the past few years,” Hyun said.
Last year, South Korea’s GDP rose to an eight-year high of 6.2 percent, but an indicator of how well the wealth was distributed fell to a six-year low.
A few months ago, the GNP’s Park Geun-hye, the daughter of former dictator Park Chung-hee, was considered a shoo-in to succeed Lee next year in the December presidential vote.
Now, her victory is looking less secure. The GNP “sweetheart” has been targeted for her inability to galvanize the party and her allies lament how she appears to have lost her Midas touch on the campaign trail.
The conservative Chosun Ilbo said Park Geun-hye needs to undergo a radical transformation to overcome her weaknesses.
Woo Yung-yup says Park Geun-hye’s image as the leading candidate has been damaged severely.
“Although she is very popular, she truly lacks the communication with the people,” Woo Yung-yup said. “She needs to present more middle-ground policies and make emotional connections with the people. The current mysterious image has shown its limits in attracting the crowd.”
Analysts say she is still the person to beat, but if a united opposition backs Ahn, the race will be wide open.
Regardless of the outcome in next year’s elections, change is in the air for both economic policymaking and on the foreign policy front.
Park Geun-hye has already indicated she will back away from the big-business policies of the current administration and pursue more welfare initiatives and has signaled a desire to more openly engage with rival North Korea.
Liberal victories would herald an even more flexible and cooperative approach to relations with Pyongyang and a likely less embracing policy toward the US.
Next year’s votes are, however, expected to be fought over domestic economic issues, rather than foreign issues. That is, unless the mercurial North stages another provocation on a par with last year’s two deadly attacks.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95