The death knell for conservative rule is getting louder by the day in South Korea, where voters are rejecting the big-business-friendly policies of the government and demand a fairer share of the country’s growing wealth.
The Grand National Party’s (GNP) dramatic fall from grace in Asia’s fourth-largest economy raises the prospect of a shift in policy to a more welfare-oriented system, as well as change in its North Korea strategy and shift in ties with Washington.
The popular vote is not going to a rival left-leaning party, rather to so-called “people candidates” — high-profile civilians with no political affiliation. Local media has cast this as a vote of no-confidence in the political establishment.
Less than six months before South Korea elects a new parliament and just over a year out from a presidential poll, the conservatives last week suffered their second big by-election loss this year, mirroring opinion polls, which show it is in serious trouble.
In last week’s vote for the mayor of Seoul — the country’s capital and the largest constituency — the GNP was cast out of office for the first time in nearly a decade.
An analysis of the results translates into the GNP losing about 30 seats in the 299-seat South Korean National Assembly, which signals an end to its majority rule. Moreover, no president has ever won office without carrying Seoul.
However, the GNP is not alone in losing favor with the electorate. The main opposition Democratic Party failed even to make it through to the two-way run-off for Seoul mayor.
Analysts say young and working-class voters are tired of both of the country’s largest parties.
“Most of the votes in this election could be labeled as the vote against the establishment, voicing the need for change in the current politics, hence the clear loser of the election would be the GNP,” Hyun Jae-ho of Korea University said.
While the Democrats themselves do not pose a direct threat in the general election, surveys show that if the left pool their vote in an alliance of liberal, or so-called “progressive” parties, they could end GNP majority rule in parliament.
“This election showed the strength of the civic groups in politics, but the problem is whether there are enough star players from civic groups who can act as the face of the people like Park [Won-soon] was for the mayor election,” Woo Jung-yup of the Asian Institute for Policy Studies said.
In the lead of the anti-establishment movement are the winner in the Seoul mayoral race: Park, a human rights lawyer and anti-corruption campaigner, and software mogul-turned university professor Ahn Cheol-soo. Both men’s politics lean to the left.
Opinion polls show Ahn has bolted from the blue to emerge as the frontrunner for next year’s presidential election, even though he has stated he has no interest in running. Analysts say there is a good chance he will change his mind given the current mood in the electorate.
Now, for the second time this year, the conservatives are bracing for a leadership shakeup amid criticism that they are out of touch with ordinary voters. Analysts say voters are angry that while the national wealth has grown, their share has dwindled.
“A deaf and dumb GNP” screamed the headline of an editorial in the conservative Korean JoongAng Daily, which lashed out at the party for tolerating corruption, intransigence and self-indulgence.
If the GNP was shown a yellow card for its crushing defeats in an April by-election, it deserves a red card for failing to rectify its problems by the time of the Seoul vote, it said.
Young voters who propelled South Korean President Lee Myung-bak into the Blue House in 2008, turned their backs on the president and his party in last week’s vote, with more than two-thirds of them voting against the GNP’s candidate in Seoul.
Rising college fees, jobs and the government’s inability to improve the lives of average citizens were among the main reasons given for their anti-government vote.
Even as South Korea grows economically, mainly as a result of the earnings of its conglomerates — or chaebol — the middle and working classes say they are seeing nothing of the profits. To the contrary, they argue inflation and stagnant wages mean they are losing out.
Hyun says the party simply must strive to become more “people friendly” as opposed to “business friendly.”
“Although the economic environment for the corporations and the businesses in Korea is great, the economic situation for small business and the low middle class has been at its worst in the past few years,” Hyun said.
Last year, South Korea’s GDP rose to an eight-year high of 6.2 percent, but an indicator of how well the wealth was distributed fell to a six-year low.
A few months ago, the GNP’s Park Geun-hye, the daughter of former dictator Park Chung-hee, was considered a shoo-in to succeed Lee next year in the December presidential vote.
Now, her victory is looking less secure. The GNP “sweetheart” has been targeted for her inability to galvanize the party and her allies lament how she appears to have lost her Midas touch on the campaign trail.
The conservative Chosun Ilbo said Park Geun-hye needs to undergo a radical transformation to overcome her weaknesses.
Woo Yung-yup says Park Geun-hye’s image as the leading candidate has been damaged severely.
“Although she is very popular, she truly lacks the communication with the people,” Woo Yung-yup said. “She needs to present more middle-ground policies and make emotional connections with the people. The current mysterious image has shown its limits in attracting the crowd.”
Analysts say she is still the person to beat, but if a united opposition backs Ahn, the race will be wide open.
Regardless of the outcome in next year’s elections, change is in the air for both economic policymaking and on the foreign policy front.
Park Geun-hye has already indicated she will back away from the big-business policies of the current administration and pursue more welfare initiatives and has signaled a desire to more openly engage with rival North Korea.
Liberal victories would herald an even more flexible and cooperative approach to relations with Pyongyang and a likely less embracing policy toward the US.
Next year’s votes are, however, expected to be fought over domestic economic issues, rather than foreign issues. That is, unless the mercurial North stages another provocation on a par with last year’s two deadly attacks.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the