Forget about the saying “when pigs fly,” because throughout the country they are doing just that. Off the shelves, that is.
Highlighting the desire for change in the country, people are rushing to fill piggy banks and donate them to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) election campaign. And the DPP has the Control Yuan to thank for this.
The Control Yuan last month made a fuss and warned the party that its acceptance of three piggy banks donated by three-year-old triplets was against the Political Donations Act (政治獻金法). The Control Yuan said Article 7 of the act stipulates that only people of voting age and those who meet other voting eligibility rules can make political donations. However, the article is more typically aimed at preventing foreigners, especially people from China, Hong Kong and Macau who are not eligible to vote, from making donations.
Moreover, given that the triplets donated their piggy banks under parental guidance, handing over the banks on stage with their mom and grandfather by their side, it seems like a minor infringement of the act. The donations were aimed more at a nice photo opportunity than political meddling by three-year-olds.
While the Control Yuan’s move could have dampened the DPP’s spirits, it instead aroused indignation among many Taiwanese and prompted the DPP to declare this month “little pigs month,” in which supporters are urged to use piggy banks to make donations to the party.
With the popularity of the piggy bank drive taking the DPP by surprise, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have an even harder time understanding what all the fuss is about, given that it appears oblivious to people’s everyday struggles despite a widening wealth gap and growing social injustice. There is a latent desire for change in the country, a fact which seems to have passed by the KMT and is clearly highlighted by a groundswell of support for the DPP’s piggy bank drive.
And yet, the KMT still does not cease to amaze with its brazenness. Seeing how well the DPP’s grassroots fundraising campaign has been received by the public, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) re--election campaign office recently also launched a TV campaign spot calling on the public to make small donations.
How is it that a political party as rich as the KMT — which made NT$3.5 billion (US$116.1 million) last year, NT$2.9 billion from stock dividends alone — can have the heart to urge its supporters to donate money?
The truth of matter is that what the KMT fears is not the coins and notes stuffed into the piggy banks; what it finds intimidating is the power behind the piggy bank movement — the collective disappointments felt by piggy bank donors in the face of the incumbent government’s poor performance.
It is fair to say that there is a movement building in Taiwan in which — little could one imagine — piggy banks are becoming part of the nation’s electoral lore.
Hopefully the DPP cherishes and takes to heart the message behind every dollar pushed into a piggy bank. Each and every piggy bank represents not just support for Tsai and her party, but, more than everything, a yearning for change that will see people’s lives improve in a country that is becoming more unjust and economically divided.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS