Loony gun lovers
I want to thank J. Michael Cole for his shocking expose of the Taiwan Defensive Firearms Association (TDFA), the anarchist, pro-violence fringe group that has now infiltrated the peaceful shores of Taiwan with its pro-gun message (“Taiwan gun group joins global fight to bear arms,” Oct. 25, page 2). As the singer and songwriter of the dynamic pro-community rock band Ballots Not Bullets, I promise I will do everything in my power to diminish the influence of these insane morons.
I was both alarmed and appalled when I read that the TDFA is promoting a referendum that would allow them to supply 8 million semi--automatic weapons to “qualified citizens” in Taiwan, wherein 5 million Taiwanese would be allowed to carry concealed handguns. This is a recipe for lawlessness and anarchy. If this becomes reality, I will leave Taiwan faster than you can say “one way ticket to New Zealand, please.”
In response to the TDFA’s claim about “semi-automatic defensive weapons,” I would respond that this is sheer lunacy. There’s nothing defensive about a semi-automatic weapon. Guns are made for one reason only: to kill.
Cole didn’t mention any statistics about how much gun violence there is in Taiwan, but I think the old adage is true: “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.”
While pro-gun people use this quote to support their case, it’s actually quite true in Taiwan. Most of the guns in the possession of Taiwanese, outside the military, police force and Aboriginal hunters, are in fact owned by gangsters in criminal organizations and used for violent crimes.
In my view, the TDFA is a group that has a hammer and sees every problem as a nail. Simply put, it’s a solution that’s looking for a problem.
In the decade I’ve lived here in Taiwan, I’ve never once seen a violent crime. Traffic accidents, yes, but it seems like the only time people resort to gun violence to “solve” problems is during elections, like when former vice president Lien Chan’s (連戰) son, Sean (連勝文), was shot through the cheek with a bullet that killed an innocent bystander at a political rally last year. This is exactly the kind of crime we don’t need more of, and more guns in the hands of “qualified citizens” will surely exacerbate this problem.
Taiwan’s police need to get on this case like flies on ... honey and deport these trigger-happy idiots to a country where they might feel more at home, say Mexico or Somalia. And Mr Cole, please use your amazing investigative talents to follow up on this compelling story.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS