President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has suggested that a peace accord with China might be signed in the next 10 years, based on three preconditions: national need, public support and legislative oversight. Everyone in Taiwan wants peace, but at this point in time these conditions and this arrangement raise several questions.
The legal documents used to handle peace-related issues at the international level are, at a minimum, peace treaties, armistices, ceasefire agreements or truces, and peace accords.
The first three are international documents, signed between countries, which are legally binding under international law. Peace accords are documents designed to avoid civil hardship and put an end to armed conflict between the legitimate government of a country and an insurgent group or several political entities within a country.
In other words, a peace accord is a kind of “statement” issued by a government and insurgent groups. As such, peace accords not only fail to meet the norms stipulated in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, they also recognize that the dispute in question is internal to the country where it is happening and that the contested land belongs to the same country.
In Taiwan’s case, there is no ongoing armed conflict and thus no urgent need to put an end to armed conflict. The cross-strait situation is the result of complex domestic and international issues that have existed since the Chinese Civil War and the Cold War.
Signing a peace accord would mean that any current or future conflict between Taiwan and China would be defined as an extension of the Chinese Civil War, which falls under the domestic jurisdiction of China, therefore increasing the legal obstacles to intervention by international organizations or other countries and also causing US arms sales to Taiwan to lose their legitimacy and legality under international law.
Finally, if the Republic of China’s (ROC) government signs a peace accord with the government of the People’s Republic of China — the victor of the Civil War and the government recognized by the world as the only legal government of China — the ROC government could no longer be the only legal government of China. Signing a peace accord would essentially turn the ROC government into an armed Chinese insurgent group, according to international law.
History is filled with many surprising and unexpected events. For example, in their quest for immortality, the ancient Chinese Daoists practiced alchemy and accidentally invented gunpowder in the process — an invention that was eventually used to kill people. And because of their deep belief that faith in Jesus would bring eternal life to his followers, European missionaries wanted to make church bells that could be heard from a great distance. After a lot of research and hard work, they finally made bells out of refined steel. However, this steel was used not only for making church bells, but also in the manufacture of cannons, making them all the more devastating. These inventions began with good intentions, but had tragic results.
Ma might also have good intentions and therefore guide his government toward signing a peace treaty or an armistice with China. If he does not, and instead intends to follow up on the 2005 Lien-Hu communique, which is about working toward ending the state of hostility between the two sides and reaching a peace accord, he would turn the Taiwan issue into a China issue.
This would in practice implement Article 7 of China’s “Anti-Secession” law, which foresees an agreement on peaceful unification, removing the legality of intervention by other members of the international community and tying the lives and livelihoods of Taiwanese to the goodwill of China. This is an issue that requires detailed rethinking.
Chiang Huang-chih is a professor of law at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Drew Cameron and Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US