During an inspection of reconstruction work at Maolin National Scenic Area in Greater Kaohsiung following the destruction wrought by Typhoon Morakot, I discovered that the roadwork was actually destroying part of the forest. Extra soil and gravel were needed to build the foundation for parts of the road that were being widened, and they were being dug out of the mountains to the side of the road on a truly alarming scale.
This robbing Peter to pay Paul farce is being played out at the scenic park. Many of Maolin’s roads were devastated by landslides during the typhoon, and reconstruction has been going on for more than two years now. This includes widening a stretch of road between Wanshan (萬山) and Duona (多納) villages. My colleagues and I went there to conduct a detailed inspection of the roadworks and found a number of problems.
First, the hills at the side of this stretch of road were dotted with diggers scooping out swathes of soil and gravel that were then transported over to the road to fill in the foundations of the widened sections. This carving up of the mountains has left the tops treeless, leveled and exposed. Has this method undergone government evaluation and has it been approved? Is it safe?
Second, the foliage along the public road — including the Chinese pistache trees with their vibrant reds and the golden rain trees now in bloom — is not only pleasing to the eye, it also performs an important function of keeping the soil anchored and thus preventing landslides. The roadside construction work has decimated all this, leaving many of the trees either dead or dying.
Finally, just how big do the roads in the Maolin National Scenic Area need to be? Were they really too narrow before they were destroyed by Morakot? Did they really need to be widened after the disaster?
All of these issues are directly related to the threat of landslides during natural disasters. Tree coverage on the mountain anchors the soil, as the network of roots keeps it in place. With the top of the mountains denuded and exposed to the elements, torrential rains can trigger landslides, destroying the roads at the foot of the mountains. Moreover, any dirt left over from engineering works on mountain roads is generally discarded over the side of the road. This covers the vegetation below, burying it under mud and rock, and of course it dies. This, then, makes landslides more likely. It is a vicious cycle.
Taiwan has the highest density of road engineering projects in the world. Does it really need bigger, wider roads? Ecology experts were opposed to the construction of the New Central Cross-island Highway running from Shuili to Tatajia. Not surprisingly, after it was completed, it has brought nothing but problems, with landslides occurring year after year. It has been called the nation’s most expensive stretch of road. You can go there any day or night, and there will be, somewhere along the road, maintenance work going on. It is the perfect example of “sustained engineering.”
The mantra on everyone’s lips these days is “sustainable development, cherish the planet.” However, the government’s policies do not seem to be headed in this direction: They are only promoting sustained engineering projects that trigger disasters.
We left Maolin a little after four in the afternoon, and we were hit by pounding rain, so heavy it was quite disconcerting. I spared a thought for the engineers and workers on the mountain. Are they safe? They may well become the first victims of this flawed government policy. It will be the forests, the public and the wildlife who have to bear the results of all this.
Fu Chih-nan is a volunteer for Citizen of the Earth, Taiwan.
Translated by Paul Cooper
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of