Look on the bright side
In his recent letter (“Letters,” page 8, Sept. 25), Dan Bloom conveys the right sense of extreme urgency about climate change, and one correct goal: immediate and massive worldwide public action to drastically cut the use of coal and oil. However, his idea that everyone becoming “grim and despairing about the future because of what we are doing with fossil fuels” will strengthen the movement against global warming is at least misstated and at worst completely wrong.
When people despair, they have lost hope and see no reason to act for their survival and a better world. And when they despair, their desperation can much more easily result in actions that express only their fear and anger. Violence is too often born of such a mindset.
Much more productive would be approaches that intensively and rapidly educate the Earth’s citizenry. First, educate them on the full, terrible realities of our current climate situation. Second, make known the range of various possible futures that we are facing, depending on how much we reduce fossil fuel use and other drivers of global warming. Third, educate people about all the specific actions individuals and organizations must take, and are increasingly taking, in order to successfully reverse the heating up of the atmosphere.
Famed scholar and activist Noam Chomsky, a champion of human liberty for more than half a century, is often asked how, in the face of continuing, horrific war and so many other inhumanities throughout the world, he can keep up his struggle for peace and social justice. Chomsky replies that, while he understands full well how miniscule the chances of turning things around might be, as long as there is any possibility of success, it is worth devoting his life to the cause.
“Optimism,” Chomsky says, “is a strategy for making a better future. Because unless you believe that the future can be better, you are unlikely to step forward and make it so.”
Let’s try and imbue all our efforts for a better world with that spirit, and let’s get more educated and more active.
Matt Nicodemus
Taipei
Beware China’s collapse
As January’s presidential and legislative elections approach, I foresee the conversation turning from this bogus “consensus” issue to what voters really care about the most: jobs and the economy. This will be precipitated by a massive slowdown in China’s economy that will panic the markets. Here’s why:
‧ Both small and medium-sized enterprises and real-estate developers are set to hit the wall as they cannot access domestic funding, even from China’s notorious shadow banking sector. Increasingly, they are being locked out of international finance vehicles as well. This is the first of many, many bad omens.
‧ In what will certainly become a widespread epidemic, some debt-strapped business owners in China are gathering whatever cash they can and fleeing their factories, never to return. These business owners disappear into the night, leaving angry workers and unpaid suppliers holding the bag.
‧ The real-estate sector is also facing major challenges, as the price of new homes has recently fallen below the price of second-hand (speculative) properties, a sure sign that the property market is about to crater. In the words of one analyst: “The China property boom has gone beyond bubble to an outright Ponzi scheme.”
‧ While China’s central government insists that it is trying to curb housing prices, local governments are ignoring these calls to restrict housing because fueling the housing bubble is the only way they can pay interest on debt. China’s local debt currently stands at 10.7 trillion yuan (US$1.7 trillion), and much of the local governments’ income is derived from land sales. When builders cannot sell their inventory — for example, the 108,181 unsold apartments in Beijing — they stop buying land for new projects, ending the local governments’ main source of revenue.
‧ China’s corrupt crony capitalist system has resulted in some of the worst mal-investment in history, including massive “ghost cities” like Ordos, all built with speculative capital. China’s debt-to-GDP ratio currently stands at 45 percent and debt levels are projected to continue rising quickly through 2013. No one knows how much of this debt would have to be written off if it was marked to market because it was used to fund unprofitable projects.
‧ Meanwhile, speculators have been hoarding copper stockpiles, worth an estimated US$7 billion to US$10 billion, and using them as collateral for all sorts of loans from the shadow lending channels. Now that copper has dived 7 percent from its August highs, and with the inevitable contraction in housing, this can only end badly.
To investors thinking about China, I remind them: There is a reason why it is called a red flag.
Here in Taiwan, voters face a choice between a legal academic who has led three years of failed economic policies while putting all his eggs in the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) basket and ballooning sovereign debt, and a highly regarded economist who wants to diversify our export destinations using agreements through APEC or the Trans-Pacific Partnership. I cannot wait for the debate where Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) asks President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九): “What will you do when — not if — China’s economy crashes?” I hope she herself has a plan for that.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS