US President Barack Obama’s administration announced on Sept. 21 that it would upgrade Taiwan’s F-16A/Bs instead of selling it F-16C/Ds. This decision set off heated exchanges between Taiwan’s ruling and opposition parties. The Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the upgrades “would prove to be even better than the F-16C/D jets.” The opposition party accused the ruling party of blowing its own trumpet and said its logic was flawed.
US arms sales to Taiwan touch on the sensitive issue of relations between Taiwan, the US and China, and media outlets around the world always pay close attention. However, Washington’s promise to provide Taiwan with adequate military equipment, as stated in the Taiwan Relations Act, to deter a Chinese attack has increasingly come into question, with a number of US academics and politicians suggesting that the US should abandon Taiwan. George Washington University professor Charles Glaser expressed such views in his article entitled “Will China’s Rise Lead to War?” in the March/April edition of Foreign Affairs. Views like this mean the latest arms deal has gained particular attention.
The Sept. 24 issue of The Economist featured an article entitled “Dim sum for China: Why America should not walk away from Taiwan,” which said there were two main arguments used to justify US desertion of Taiwan. First, under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) cross-strait relations are better than in the past. According to this view, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is more nationalistic than the KMT, and there are worries that if Taiwan declares independence, the US “risks being dragged into conflict, even nuclear war.”
Second, even without war, Taiwan would still be an obstacle to better Sino-US relations. Giving China what it wants — such as Taiwan — could be exchanged for Sino-US cooperation “on a host of issues ranging from nuclear proliferation to climate change.”
Rebutting the first argument, the article said that DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) “is a lot more moderate than Mr Chen [former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁)].” In addition, it said that while the younger DPP politicians may be nationalistic, they are also pragmatic and understand that continued US support is crucial.
The article said that if the US abandoned Taiwan, it would essentially be conceding to China’s intentions to annex Taiwan and that this would not be beneficial to improving US-China relations. It said that a look at China’s diplomatic history shows that it only respects powerful nations. Furthermore, “appeasement would also probably increase China’s appetite for regional domination” since its “core interests” in the area are growing continuously, it said. This could “lead the region’s democracies to worry that America might be willing to let them swing too,” it said, adding “that is why, as long as China insists on the right to use force in Taiwan, America should continue to support the island.”
A capable government focuses on economic development when it knows it has guaranteed the nation’s security; it does not blindly pursue economic benefit at the risk of undermining the nation. Taiwan’s national defense should be based on a “Taiwan consensus” that includes both the governing and the opposition camps. The failure to obtain F-16C/Ds is a setback, further widening the gap in military power between China and Taiwan. Hopefully, the government would stick to its promise to continue pushing the US to sell F-16C/Ds and submarines. Otherwise, with China continuing to threaten Taiwan militarily and blocking its arms purchase, Taiwan can only wait to be pushed around.
Liu Shun-ming has a master’s degree in public policy and management from Carnegie Mellon University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US