Something to be proud of
With the non-event centennial of the exiled state of the Republic of China (ROC) fast approaching, now would be a perfect time for this government and president to seize the opportunity to catch the attention of the world and raise Taiwan’s profile as a truly progressive Asian republic. To this end, may I humbly suggest the following five policies:
First, Taiwan could ban the catch, sale and consumption of all shark meat and fins. Second, it could abolish the death penalty. Third, it could legalize, regulate and tax the production and sale of most currently illegal narcotics. Fourth, Taiwan could scrap the Referendum Review Committee and radically lower the 50 percent threshold for passing a referendum. Finally, Taiwan could abolish the practice of keeping any animal more than 5kg in weight in zoos or aquariums.
These policies would have the world’s journalists immediately rushing here to see what an empathetic and humane country looks and feels like.
Of course, there is no chance any of those ideas can become realities, which I think speaks volumes for the real “achievements” of the ROC thus far in its 100 years of despotic, corrupt, environmentally destructive and inhumane existence.
If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wants Taiwanese to identify with and be proud of the ROC, perhaps it might first think about achieving something truly inspiring for Taiwanese to be proud of.
Insult to human intelligence
I am happy to see that Bo Tedards kept fighting his battle with the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD) over his demotion (“TFD fined for violating labor laws,” Oct. 1, page 3).
He has done so much through the foundation for democracy all over Asia, including Taiwan and China, but also through his long stint at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Research and Planning Committee, where he worked hard on to help turn two UN covenants on human rights into national law, assisting former deputy minister of foreign affairs Michael Kau (高英茂) in establishing the foundation and doing so many things to set up the World Forum on Democracy in Asia, arguably one of the foundation’s largest flagship projects. And this is not to mention his years working at the Taiwan Association for Human Rights.
I will pass over the rest of what he did and does, such as having articulated for the foundation the recently internationally piloted Asia Human Rights Award.
As Albert Camus once wrote, “life is sometimes nothing but an insult to intelligence” (my translation from French).
The KMT proved Camus right when it chased out a number of top TFD people when President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took power, not to mention the thousands of contractual employees more or less associated with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) at any level of government in less than two years. So much for Ma’s “Taiwan Cheers, Great” slogan.
Politics in Taiwan is becoming more like in the US, with extreme polarization that leads nowhere. It is high time for the KMT and DPP alike to face the inevitable need for a certain degree of consensus, which workers from all walks of life desperately hope to see for the sake of not only the economy, but life in general in Taiwan.
Good luck Tedards and don’t give up.
Again, the misguided political judgement that led to your secretive demotion during your parental leave is like what Camus said: an insult to human intelligence.
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new