In her small fashion boutique in a village near Saint-Etienne, Valerie Dongrazi is feeling the pressure of French banking jitters and the economic rut.
The 44-year-old store owner has not paid herself a salary for more than a year. When she did, it was 1,300 euros (US$1,730) a month. She has had to start buying cheaper foreign stock, as clients in her village in southeastern France who once paid 270 euros for a good winter coat, can now afford just 150 euros. To stay on top of overheads, she relies on going to her bank to increase costly overdrafts or ask for loans.
However, with a big question mark over French banks’ stability, shares in the biggest banks plummeting and talk of a state bailout, the lifeline of bank credit to businesses like Dongrazi’s is drying up. French banks are nervous about lending money, companies are struggling and consumer confidence has fallen to the lowest level since February 2009, when France was suffering its worst recession since World War II.
“There’s a mood of fear; people are not buying for pleasure, barely for necessity. I’m not optimistic,” she said.
Rumors about the fragility of French banks and their ability to cope with losses from Greek debt has thrown a spotlight on the wider woes of the economy and its slippery hold on its “AAA” rating. The shares of France’s biggest banks have lost half of their value in just three months. In any other country, this might signal panic on the streets, but France believes it is battling bigger economic problems: spiralling public debt, stagnant growth, low business morale and high unemployment.
PROTECTED
French banks continue to insist they do not need a state bailout and can withstand losses. Although big international firms have begun moving funds out of Paris banks, households are not rushing to withdraw savings.
A bank run similar to the one that British bank Northern Rock suffered in 2007 would be unlikely in France, where savings have high state protection. As one economist said, there is a notion that the state will “always step in” as protector. There is little chance of a major French bank going under because it has been made clear that the government could, within minutes, take the decision to recapitalize.
However, the banking wobble has highlighted serious wider problems in the sluggish economy. Just as the omnipresent state offers a safety net for the banks, business lobbies say its suffocating grip on the country’s financial workings are more of a problem than ever. France did not fall quite as low as Britain or Ireland in 2008, but — famous for red tape, regulation and high labor costs — it is still struggling to bounce back. The eurozone’s second---biggest economy failed to grow at all in the second quarter as consumer spending nosedived.
“I think the seriousness of the banks’ situation was exaggerated,” said Marc Touati, economist at Paris-based Assya. “The real problem is growth. Unfortunately, a recession is approaching.”
He sees the risk of a slowdown that could last into next year. With no growth, there would be higher unemployment and more public debt. Failure to rein in France’s public deficit —one of Europe’s highest — could threaten credibility abroad and social cohesion at home.
“In France, even more than elsewhere, all this depends too much on politics and political decisions,” he added.
HOLES TO FILL
With seven months until a presidential election, the role of politicians is crucial. The priority is to plug the hole in state coffers created by decades of the state living beyond its means. France has a vast social security deficit, as well as big holes in local authority and central government finances. The country has not balanced a budget since 1974.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy has published belt--tightening budget proposals for next year: to raise taxes. The government wants to stick to its target to cut the deficit to 3 percent of GDP in 2013, but though it has cut its growth predictions to 1.75 percent for this year and next, economists fear growth will not be strong enough to generate the tax revenues the government is counting on.
“What’s the economic strategy for the next decade? I don’t think anyone has a clue,” said Alexander Law, chief economist at Xerfi. “There is an idea France will have to start copying Germany, be slightly less generous to households and more accommodating fiscally to companies. That hasn’t seeped through into the political echelons; the 2012 budget is taxing everyone a bit more.”
“Tax will move from companies towards consumers — people know that’s going to happen, but they don’t know when and how, or how unpopular it’s going to be — ranging from very unpopular to horrendously unpopular,” he said.
Jean-Guilhem Darre, of the SDI union for businesses with fewer than 20 staff, said the next six months would be hard: “We’re not yet in the same state as in 2008, but we see the elements returning to have the same type of crisis as 2008.”
Pierre Coinaud, who represents business leaders in the central Limousin region, blames the overweening state.
“State rules and regulations are so rigid it’s difficult for firms to react quickly or adapt to economic realities,” he said.
“France’s problem is that we don’t export enough, we live in an internal market, kept afloat and helped along by the state,” he said. “Now the state needs to tighten its belt and that will have an effect on the market. French businesses need more freedom, more air to breathe.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US