Environmental D-Day
The recent interview with Laurence Smith (“Northern Lights,” page 13, Sept. 22) about how climate change might positively impact nations that lie north of 45 degrees latitude was well reported. Smith’s book, The World in 2050, is an important one, too. When it was reviewed last year in the Seattle Times, the reviewer said that Smith in the final analysis “comes up with some bleak conclusions.”
The Taipei Times asked Smith if he had read the Seattle Times piece that concluded that the future looked grim and if he agreed.
“I’m optimistic,” Smith told the reporter, adding: “There are lots of reasons for optimism … That being said, looking at climate change, I am actually quite pessimistic.”
The Seattle Times said that the book was “an important book, a wake-up call for doubting Thomases who believe it’s OK to drive gas guzzlers because they can afford it. As I read it one thought I never had before kept reoccurring: Thank goodness I’m old.”
While Smith remains an optimist in his public lectures and on his international book tour, as he told the Taipei Times, he is in fact “quite pessimistic” when looking at what’s happening to our world in terms of climate change.
Smith is right to feel pessimistic about what we are doing to this Earth, and it is high time that everyone becomes grim and despairing about the future because of what we are doing with fossil fuels.
While Smith believes that nations in the northern regions will benefit in the short term from climate change — longer summer agricultural seasons, shorter shipping routes through an ice-free Arctic — he also says that in the long term, if there is to be a long term, we must stop using fossil fuels, tone down our luxurious lifestyles and start living in a more -environmentally friendly way.
I myself am a pessimist and I feel that by 2050, 2080, 2100 for sure, the Earth’s population will have been decimated by catastrophic climate events that will see more than 8 billion people die and leave only 200,000 souls eking out a sad existence in those regions above 45 degrees latitude. It’s not going to be a pretty picture and we have to stop fooling ourselves and pretending that everything is going to be okay.
Everything is not going to be okay.
How loud must one shout from the rooftops to alert the world to the fact that we are in dire straits? We are looking at life in “polar cities” by the year 2080, and not a sanitized Hollywood view of such a science fiction scenario.
Indeed, we are headed to hell on Earth. Smith does not want to say this in public because he is a respectable professor from the University of California, Los Angeles, with a book and a career to promote, and I salute him for his probing research.
I am glad he came to Taiwan to speak at the Lung Yingtai Cultural Foundation’s MediaTek lecture series, as he has an important message.
However, Smith’s message is not enough. It is time to drop the optimism and become realistic about humankind’s future.
If we do not collectively act right now, then we will be doomed. What does it take to wake a sleeping planet? Do people think that life in polar cities is going to be fun — and a financial boost to economies?
We are headed to hell on Earth. We will live, those of us who survive, that is, in desolate polar cities. Enough of this pretty academic rigamarole about a happy future in what Smith calls “northern rim countries.”
Sure, optimism will help sell books and further one’s career. All professors take this route. However, it no longer serves the public good or the future of the human race. We have arrived at a crossroad and it is time to take action. We must stop the burning of coal and oil today. Yesterday, in fact. Time has run out.
Dan Bloom
Chiayi City
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS