The way Taiwanese politicians have been cozying up to the US as exposed in the WikiLeaks cables is totally understandable. In the past, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was only able to survive thanks to US protection. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), whose ideals are close to those of the US, only avoided being affected by the strategies of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by gaining US support. However, it is disappointing to see that the leaked cables seem to indicate that the US has had close interactions with the KMT, but not so much with the DPP.
This is not normal. The KMT does have longstanding historical links with the US, but the DPP’s ideals are more in line with those of the US, so why is there so little interaction between the DPP and the US? This is one of the reasons for some of the misunderstandings between Washington and the DPP during the DPP administration. However, the main reason was that after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, US president George W. Bush’s strategies changed and he had to sacrifice a little bit of Taiwan in order to please China.
DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) visit to the US is aimed at starting a new era in the party’s relationship with the US to improve Taiwan-US understanding when dealing with relations between Taiwan, China and the US in a way that pays attention to national interests and does not sacrifice universal values.
As to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) relationship with the US, some have criticized Washington, saying it has used the issue of whther Ma’s US green card is still valid to control him. However, that is a good thing. Otherwise, Ma would have thrown in the towel to the CCP a long time ago. It was because of this issue that the US learned that former minister of foreign affairs Francisco Ou (歐鴻鍊) had talked with the CCP about People’s Liberation Army troops coming to Taiwan to help with disaster relief operations following Typhoon Morakot. As soon as the US found out, it immediately leaked information that Taiwan had refused US aid. Before the Ministry of National Defense had time to guide air traffic, US military helicopters had landed in Taiwan to help with disaster relief and a dejected Ou had to return to Taiwan.
There are other examples of the special rights and privileges held by the US here in Taiwan that help assure the safety of this country. I would even go so far as to say that I welcome US troops being stationed in Taiwan, either formally or indirectly. These rights and privileges are part of the cooperation between the US and Taiwan and the price we have to pay to protect Taiwan from being trampled by the CCP. That is also the reason why the US still has troops stationed in Japan and South Korea, as well as the reason why some Southeast Asian nations could allow US troops to be stationed in their countries.
What is worrying, however, is that in order to get into bed with China, Ma will have to eventually free himself of US control, and he will ask for assistance from the CCP to do so. Ma’s values make it easy for him to accept the CCP’s ideology.
The executive director of Ma’s re-election campaign, King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), who has no official government status, recently said Ma might soon visit China. This makes it clear they have already prepared such a step because Ma always listens to everything King says.
Surely, Tsai was being ironic when she called on Ma to use his position as King’s boss to discipline him and control his actions. After all, every time Ma’s election office tries to deny an error, they end up confirming it.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers