The confidential US diplomatic cables involving Taiwan from 2007 to 2009 released by WikiLeaks on Aug. 30 have shed light on the relationships between senior members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their competition for power. The scariest part of these leaked cables are details about how the likes of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) have been struggling for power in the KMT, as well as the degree of infighting within the KMT itself.
These documents are truly shocking and terrifying. In essence, they show just how bad these politicians are, how dishonest they are and how their actions are very different from the image they have long held up to the public.
The majority of the cables center around the American Institute in Taiwan, focusing on the US’ view of the action, or inaction, of Taiwanese politicians and how it has affected US interests in Taiwan and other parts of Asia. The issues the cables deal with and the people they mention provide us with a degree of insight into the US and how it goes about upholding its interests in the Asia-Pacific region. The cables’ description of the debate over whether Ma still holds a green card also shows how the US has a strong weapon when it comes to controlling Taiwan’s leaders, internal affairs, diplomacy, arms sales and China policy.
For more than three years now, popular opinion in Taiwan of politicians like Ma has been that they are dishonest, ineffectual figures who say one thing and do another, that they lack the capacity to either forgive others or understand the needs of the public and that they are incompetent at implementing policy as well as ineffectual in disaster response. The leaked documents also show how the likes of Ma deny the ability of their opponents and distrust them. All these only prove how true public opinion of the Ma administration is.
There are certain things that unite politicians like Ma. They suffer from selective hearing, listening exclusively to opinions that reinforce their own. They are selective, too, in their choice of facts and figures, employing them judiciously to gloss over the contradictions that exist in their lies. Furthermore, they only adopt the extreme views of a small minority, are blind to international developments and ignore mainstream public opinion.
In doing so, the Ma administration has set Taiwan on an abnormal course of development. In terms of economics, this means putting the interest of big business before that of ordinary people. In terms of sovereignty, this means China takes precedence over Taiwan. The Ma administration has also turned a blind eye to human rights abuses and insists on focusing exclusively on the short term when it comes to governance.
The cables exposed by WikiLeaks show politics for what it truly is. They are an opportunity for members of the public to know who is and who is not working in their best interests, something that will inform how they vote in the next election and whether they want to see another change of government in this country.
Chan Chang-chuan is a professor at National Taiwan University’s Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS