The confidential US diplomatic cables involving Taiwan from 2007 to 2009 released by WikiLeaks on Aug. 30 have shed light on the relationships between senior members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their competition for power. The scariest part of these leaked cables are details about how the likes of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) have been struggling for power in the KMT, as well as the degree of infighting within the KMT itself.
These documents are truly shocking and terrifying. In essence, they show just how bad these politicians are, how dishonest they are and how their actions are very different from the image they have long held up to the public.
The majority of the cables center around the American Institute in Taiwan, focusing on the US’ view of the action, or inaction, of Taiwanese politicians and how it has affected US interests in Taiwan and other parts of Asia. The issues the cables deal with and the people they mention provide us with a degree of insight into the US and how it goes about upholding its interests in the Asia-Pacific region. The cables’ description of the debate over whether Ma still holds a green card also shows how the US has a strong weapon when it comes to controlling Taiwan’s leaders, internal affairs, diplomacy, arms sales and China policy.
For more than three years now, popular opinion in Taiwan of politicians like Ma has been that they are dishonest, ineffectual figures who say one thing and do another, that they lack the capacity to either forgive others or understand the needs of the public and that they are incompetent at implementing policy as well as ineffectual in disaster response. The leaked documents also show how the likes of Ma deny the ability of their opponents and distrust them. All these only prove how true public opinion of the Ma administration is.
There are certain things that unite politicians like Ma. They suffer from selective hearing, listening exclusively to opinions that reinforce their own. They are selective, too, in their choice of facts and figures, employing them judiciously to gloss over the contradictions that exist in their lies. Furthermore, they only adopt the extreme views of a small minority, are blind to international developments and ignore mainstream public opinion.
In doing so, the Ma administration has set Taiwan on an abnormal course of development. In terms of economics, this means putting the interest of big business before that of ordinary people. In terms of sovereignty, this means China takes precedence over Taiwan. The Ma administration has also turned a blind eye to human rights abuses and insists on focusing exclusively on the short term when it comes to governance.
The cables exposed by WikiLeaks show politics for what it truly is. They are an opportunity for members of the public to know who is and who is not working in their best interests, something that will inform how they vote in the next election and whether they want to see another change of government in this country.
Chan Chang-chuan is a professor at National Taiwan University’s Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS