The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) promised that Hong Kong’s political system and way of life would remain unchanged for 50 years after 1997, when the handover of Hong Kong from the UK to China took place. However, in the past a few years, the political environment there has been worsening. One obvious sign is that the Hong Kong government often abuses police power to suppress peaceful demonstrations.
As a result, in a recent survey conducted by the University of Hong Kong public opinion center, HKU POP, public approval ratings for the Hong Kong police have fallen to their lowest level since 1997. On Aug. 18, Hong Kong police violently handled and illegally detained protesting students during a visit by Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) to the University of Hong Kong. The incident not only led to much increased tension between democracy activists and the police, but also drew wide criticism from lawyers, journalists and academics.
The police themselves were not to blame for the government’s misconduct.
As Wang Guangya (王光亞), director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs office of China’s State Council, said: Hong Kong civil servants “only know how to accept and execute instructions.”
High-ranking officials in Hong Kong’s government should be held responsible for the incident, but it is not very helpful to over-criticize them, because they were executing instructions too.
The real problem is that the territory still does not have universal suffrage. In the election for Hong Kong’s chief executive, which is to be held next year, the “functional constituency parties” will still be instructed by Beijing on who to vote for. The CCP will definitely manipulate the election and decide who will be the next chief executive.
Knowing this, it is easy to understand why Hong Kong Chief Secretary Henry Tang (唐英年), who is one of the CCP’s preferred candidates for the next chief executive, responded to the accusations of civil rights violations by calling them “completely rubbish,” Hong Kong Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee (李少光), who is seeking to take Tang’s position as chief secretary, followed Tang to denounce the media queries as “complete rubbish” and Commissioner of Police Andy Tsang (曾偉雄), who may be promoted to secretary for security, keeps adopting a hard line on demonstrations for human rights and democracy.
These Hong Kong officials are making the “rational choice” to obey and please those who give them political power. Accordingly, they need not care what protesters think while they take action to suppress them. One reason is Beijing does not like such demonstrations. Another reason is that lay citizens’ votes do not count in the election for the core leaders and thus do not affect their political careers.
On this point, government officials in Hong Kong are not too different from the CCP cadres, and the Hong Kong Police are becoming more like Chinese police while suppressing demonstrations, as a Hong Kong democracy activist commented.
It is the CCP’s strategy to delay universal suffrage for Hong Kong to strengthen its manipulation of the territory’s politics. The strategy is successful, as can be seen from the deteriorating democracy and human rights record in Hong Kong.
If the trend continues, “one country, two systems” is doomed to failure. Some people are rethinking Hong Kong’s political status. The rise of political movements promoting Hong Kong’s local values and British colonial culture, such as the Hong Kong City-State Autonomy Movement, gives a sign that “one country, two systems” is in doubt among Hong Kong’s people. “One country, two systems” is dying in Hong Kong.
Zaijun Yuan is a political scientist based in Hong Kong.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry