There is an Arabic word you come across a lot when Palestinians talk about their future. Sumud means steadfastness and it has turned into a strategy: When the imbalance of power is so pronounced, the most important thing to do is to stay put.
Staying put against overwhelming odds is regarded as a victory.
However, it is more than just a word. It is the look in Rifqua al-Kurd’s eyes as she fights eviction in Sheikh Jarrah, East Jerusalem. She lives out of boxes because when the police throw her out and the settlers move in she does not want the clothes thrown into the street.
Sumud is the tenacity with which Mohammed Hussein Jibor, a farmer, clings to a rock-strewn patch of land in the South Hebron hills in 38?C heat. His water cistern has been destroyed three times this year because he does not have a permit for it, even though the court acknowledges it is his land.
Sumud sums up the attitude of the Bedouins struggling to stay in 45 unrecognized villages in the Negev, without a supply of water, electricity or schools. Once the entire Negev was theirs, now only 6 percent is. Israel wants to put the Bedouins in townships while establishing 130 Jewish villages and agricultural settlements on the land.
“They want Jews to be Bedouin and Bedouins to be Ashkenaz [European Jews],” the Bedouin’s M ember of the Knesset Talab al-Sana said.
Sumud crops up in some unexpected places — not only East Jerusalem, the West Bank or Gaza, but in Jaffa, Lod and in Arab communities all throughout Israel. As next month looms and with it the attempt by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to get a declaration of statehood from the UN, the spotlight has swiveled on to these.
This is not a casual shift, as it could affect outcomes. If Israel ends its occupation of the West Bank and allows it to join with Gaza, the result could be two states — a Palestinian one alongside an Israeli one.
CIVIL RIGHTS
However, if you accompany that with a civil rights movement inside Israel, the goal could be very different — a secular, democratic state “for all its citizens,” where Jew, Christian and Muslim are equal.
A one-state solution in which Jewish citizens lose an inbuilt majority. The end of Zionism, no less.
More than 100,000 Arabs stayed on after 1948 and today number more than 1.5 million, roughly a fifth of the population of Israel. The ’48 Arabs, as they are known, are no longer seen as separate, exclusive or privileged. After so many years, their fight for civil rights within Israel is a struggle most Palestinians under occupation can identify with. It was not always thus.
They were known pejoratively as “insiders,” according to the dissident Israeli historian Ilan Pappe, who has written a book about them.
Trying to be “good Arabs” in Jewish eyes was tantamount to collaboration in Arab ones. However, much has changed.
“The people in the West Bank understood what the minorities inside Israel felt like, after years of deriding them for being lesser Palestinians, and that when the main impulse of the power that controls everything in your daily life is expulsionist, staying put is quite an achievement,” Pappe said.
Another historian, Sami Abu Shehadeh, is doing his doctoral thesis on Jaffa as the major Arab cultural and economic center during the Palestine Mandate period. It had its own Arabic press, eight cinemas, five hospitals and about 120,000 people. After the 1948 war, 3,900 were left.
FRAMING
It is standard practice for historians at Tel Aviv University to explain the time frame of their research. Shehadeh stopped his in 1948 because that was when Jaffa stopped existing as a city.
“My adviser told me: ‘Sami, we might agree or disagree on the word expelled, but I don’t know who will sit on your committee [to adjudicate the thesis] if you insist on using it,’” Shehadeh said.
A compromise was negotiated — rare in this part of the world.
Shehadeh wrote that, as a result of the war, the Arabs of Jaffa “had to leave and were not allowed back.”
“Forget politics, on the basic historical facts we fight on everything,” he said. “I don’t even know where to start a normal discussion. We live totally separate lives. Outsiders don’t see it. In Israel there are different spaces for Jews and Arabs. The problem is the vast majority of elites, and not just political, but economic and intellectual ones, define themselves as being part of a Jewish democracy and concentrate all their thinking on the rights of the Jews. Non-Jews, be they Christian or Muslim, are excluded from any serious decision-making process in their lives.”
That goes for the Israeli left as well as right. As a member of the Tel Aviv-Jaffa municipal council, Shehadeh tried to persuade Yael Dayan, the left-wing head of the coalition in charge of the council, to divide Tel Aviv-Jaffa into quarters, like any other big city. Maybe it is better for the Arabs of Jaffa if “we” keep on running things for them, Shehadeh was told.
“The only thing the world knows about Jaffa is oranges,” Shehadeh said. “I am not an orange. [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu called people like me a demographic time bomb. How can I explain to my children that they are a bomb?”
The discrimination suffered by his community is extensively documented. Half live below the poverty line, 48 percent can not build a house for the next 15 years because there are no permits or plans. Only 19 percent of Arab women with Israeli citizenship are in a job, compared with 65 percent of Jewish women.
However, the terrain of their changing identity and allegiance is not so well mapped. Israel demands expressions of loyalty from them.
Loyalty to what, they ask. A democracy or a supremacist state?
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers