Kiyoko Okoshi had a simple goal when she spent about US$625 for a dosimeter: She missed her daughter and grandsons and wanted them to come home.
Local officials kept telling her that their remote village was safe, even though it was less than 32km from the crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. But her daughter remained dubious, especially since no one from the government had taken radiation readings near their home.
So starting in April, Okoshi began using her dosimeter to check nearby forest roads and rice paddies. What she found was startling: Near one sewage ditch the meter beeped wildly and the screen read 67 microsieverts per hour, a potentially harmful level. Okoshi and a cousin who lives nearby worked up the courage to confront elected officials, who did not respond, confirming their worry that the government was not doing its job.
Illustration: Yenchun Chou
With her simple yet bold act, Okoshi joined the small but growing number of Japanese who have decided to step in as the government fumbles its reaction to the widespread contamination, which leaders acknowledge is much worse than originally announced.
Some mothers as far away as Tokyo, 241km to the south of the plant, have begun testing for radioactive materials. And when radiation specialists recently offered a seminar in Tokyo on using dosimeters, more than 250 people showed up, forcing organizers to turn some people away.
Even some bureaucrats have taken the initiative: Officials in several towns in Fukushima prefecture are cleaning the soil in school yards without help from the central government, and a radiation expert with the Health Ministry who quit his job over his bosses’ slow response to the nuclear accident is helping city leaders in Fukushima do their own monitoring.
Such activism would barely merit comment in the US, but it is exceptional in a country where people generally trust their leaders to watch out for them. Driven by fear and even despair, that faith has been eroded by a sense that government officials have been, at best, overwhelmed by the enormousness of the disaster, and at worst, hiding how bad things are.
“They don’t riot and they don’t even demonstrate very much, but they are not just sitting on their hands, either,” said Gerald Curtis, Burgess Professor of Political Science at Columbia University and a longtime Japan expert.
“What the dosimeter issue reveals is that people are getting more nervous rather than less about radiation dangers,” he says.
The corrosion of trust, at first aimed at faceless bureaucrats and lawmakers in distant Tokyo, now includes governors, mayors and city councils as well, a potentially unsettling trend because it pits neighbors against neighbors. That trust may also be hard to restore: Under pressure from concerned citizens, bureaucrats in Tokyo have expanded their monitoring, but many people doubt the government’s standards are safe or that officials are doing a thorough enough job of testing.
It did not help that the government recently had to backtrack on the acceptable exposure levels for schoolchildren after a senior government adviser quit in a tearful news conference, saying he did not want children to be exposed to such levels, and parents protested. The recent discovery that radioactive beef made it into stores raised fresh alarms.
“We need to do strict research to make people feel assured,” said Keiichi Miho, the mayor of Nihonmatsu, a city of 60,000 people west of the Dai-ichi plant.
The mayor is one of a growing number of local officials who have tackled the issue directly, spending millions of dollars on steps like creating a radiation map of his city.
“That’s the only way to regain credibility,” he said.
Okoshi is an unlikely activist. A lifelong farmer, she lives with her 85-year-old mother, and one of her daughters resisted the lure of the cities that has drawn so many Japanese, choosing instead to live under the same roof as her mother and grandmother.
In uncharted territory, Okoshi said she apologized to her neighbor for making trouble.
Still, she felt she had no other choice. Several weeks after the crisis began in March, there were still fewer than 10 monitoring posts in Iwaki, and most of them were in the more populated parts of the city rather than its outlying villages like Shidamyo, where Okoshi lives.
Plus, her rambling farmhouse was feeling increasingly empty since her husband died several months ago and her daughter’s family fled, as did many others.
“Our life was so lively when the four boys were running around the mountains in the back of the house,” she said.
After Okoshi’s tests continued to show high levels of radiation her cousin Chuhei Sakai, a farmer in the area, went with several other villagers to show her data to the mayor. He did not respond, Sakai said.
Since then, she has earned a reputation for her grassroots monitoring.
“Every time I have mentioned my name at meetings recently, city officials there say, ‘Ah, you are the one who measured the radiation,’” she said.
Sakai suspects the city leaders — who say testing should be handled by the national and prefectural government — declined to act because they wanted to avoid any stigma that the findings might create.
The dynamics of the fight began to shift with the arrival of valuable reinforcements. One was Kazuyoshi Sato, a councilman who has long opposed the nuclear industry, an unpopular stance in a city where many people were employed at the Dai-ichi plant.
Although dosimeter measurements taken by amateurs are considered crude because they only measure one kind of radiation emission and do not account for how long a person may have been exposed to it, Sato suspected Okoshi’s fears were founded after he saw a map of airborne and soil readings made by the US Department of Energy and the Japanese government. It, too, is relatively basic, but it showed a patch of bright yellow right over her village of Shidamyo, an indicator of high levels of cesium-134 and cesium-137.
The councilman, in turn, recruited Shinzo Kimura, the radiation expert who quit the Health Ministry. Kimura has since done extensive testing to see if Okoshi’s readings were right. He says they are — and that is bad news.
Radioactive materials do not always fall in neat patterns; vagaries of wind direction and landscape can mean one area is hit badly, while others nearby are not. Although some areas of Iwaki showed relatively low levels of radioactive materials, soil samples from one farm in Shidamyo show levels of radioactive materials Kimura says are as high as those found in the evacuation zone around the Chernobyl nuclear accident site in Ukraine.
The city has finally decided to start monitoring for radioactive materials in the air, but has not yet determined how serious its problems are. Okoshi takes no comfort in having been proven right, but she feels she has made a difference. She knows because the friend to whom she offered an apology for making a fuss assured her it was not necessary.
“She said, ‘No, no.’” Okoshi recalled. “‘I would have no information if you didn’t measure.’”
Additional reporting by Yasuko Kamiizumi
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers