Apple has complied with the Taipei City Government’s request to provide a seven-day trial period for software bought through its online App Store during which the software can be returned for a full refund.
The city government says that this will protect consumers and has asked all major foreign app suppliers to follow suit. Google flatly refused to provide the trial period for its Android Market, taking down all paid apps from its online store until the matter has been resolved. It looks like Google will be exploring other options.
Clearly, foreign firms are not willing to take these things sitting down, and in the meantime, the city government is endangering the digital content industry in Taiwan.
One thing that is annoying about the online stores of these non-Taiwanese companies is the way they do not seem to cater to customers who use traditional Chinese characters and that many overseas Web sites visited by large numbers of Taiwanese have either poor Chinese interfaces or are otherwise very user-unfriendly. This is what is really at the crux of the issue. It is not so much about whether they allow people to return goods, and one does have to remember that these companies have mechanisms in place that apply to tens of millions of users all around the world.
The main problem is that, because these firms and products do not cater well to Chinese-speaking users and as the company offices are often located overseas, the response to end users in Taiwan is often quite slow. If the services were offered free of charge, there would be little cause to complain, but when Taiwanese users are paying for services they expect to get something in return.
The main thing that differentiates a product consisting entirely of digital content and, say, an exercise bike sold on a TV shopping channel, is the residual value. In the case of an app game, once the user has completed it, he or she is unlikely to want to play it again. Its value is essentially spent. The same is true for an e-book or digital magazine: Once you have finished it, why go back and read it a second time?
With the exercise bike, once you return it you forgo the benefits that can be derived from continued ownership, in terms of getting yourself in shape. There is really no point, then, in selling game apps or e-books when people are just going to be trying to complete app games within seven days, for example. If you can read a Giddens Ko (九把刀) book in a week, why part with your money? You may just as well get yourself a refund.
The Enforcement Rules of the Consumer Protection Act (消費者保護法施行細則), which governs the seven-day trial period, does not make sense for virtual products. The problem is that you cannot sell digital content in a physical store because the product is intangible. What digital products offer you is an experience and they are not something you “own,” short of having them implanted as brain waves. Returning a physical object bought online or in an actual store takes time and effort, unlike applying for a refund for digital content, which is only a mouse click away. This is something which is clearly cause for concern for many companies.
The government has spent quite a lot of money on the so-called digital content industry, perhaps hoping that major local manufacturers such as HTC or Acer are not toppled by the likes of Apple, and core to this is digital products, such as mobile applications. The Industrial Development Bureau says that it alone will spend more than NT$3 billion (US$104 million) before 2013 on promoting digital content.
The uncertain climate in Taiwan makes it difficult for companies to develop here and foreign companies have realized it is better not to set up their offices or Asia-Pacific headquarters in the Taiwanese market. This is as bad for industries in Taiwan as it is for the government. E-book sellers such as Amazon are avoiding the Taiwanese market. Nobody seems to have a clue as to who the relevant official documentation is supposed to be sent to and all the evidence points to the fact that they are avoiding the potential headache of trying to figure it out by just steering clear of the whole mess.
The way this plays out is that these foreign firms are discouraged from setting up in Taiwan and are not interested in dealing with Taiwanese customers or would prefer to deal with Taiwanese firms as companies operating outside of the country.
The city government thinks it has pulled off a real coup politically speaking, but it really does not get it. Next it will be announcing it has come to similar “agreements” with every other company, although everyone has their own idea of what should be done. These foreign companies will, in addition to adding extra clauses on the seven-day trial period to make provision for Taiwanese users, but that will be it.
The main market for Taiwanese developers is certainly the domestic market. The government’s policies will, frankly, barely touch the foreign companies, and only have a limited effect on consumers. However, they will cause considerable damage to local developers.
The government’s inconsistent policies are hitting the industry’s confidence hard. To make it as a developer in Taiwan, you have to do more than just comply with international practices, you also have to worry about political clowns meddling in these matters, who leave a terrible mess for the industry to sort out.
If the government is of no help there is little one can do, but if it actually gets in the way, what hope is there?
Shyu Ting-yao chairs the Association of Digital Culture Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry