President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) recently attended a fishing festival in Lukang (鹿港), Changhua County, during which he listed all the things his government has done for the nation’s fishing industry. However, one has to ask whether fishermen are really finding it easier to make a living these days. Let us look at some figures.
When Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators were debating their fishing policies, they apparently preferred comparing the results of their polices with the results of policies used by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) when it was in office. Let us compare income levels for fishermen on the same basis to see under which government our fishermen were better off.
Official statistics show that in 2007, when president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in office, Taiwan’s fishing industry produced 1.5 million tonnes of fish, at a value of NT$95 billion (US$3.3 billion) respectively. In 2009, it produced 1.09 million tonnes at a value of NT$86.1 billion.
Let us now look at exports of fish products. In 2007, Taiwan exported 670,000 tonnes of fish products, worth NT$40.8 billion. These were both higher than figures for 2009, when Taiwan exported 580,000 tonnes of fish products worth NT$38.9 billion.
In addition, while Ma claims that he has taken part in 32 events related to the fishing industry, we can see from the things he says that he does not truly understand the suffering of fishermen. The Control Yuan only recently passed laws that corrected a botched Council of Agriculture policy to create a database on fish products that the council spent 10 years on and has yet to complete.
This failed plan was one of the reasons behind Taiwanese fish breeders losing their competitive advantage. Another example of botched policy is the shopping plaza that was built next to Hualien’s Recreational Wharf and which has been idle since construction began four years ago. It has earned itself a name among local residents as the most beautiful waste of money in Hualien.
Taiwan’s fishing industry is facing many problems and each requires the government’s attention. These problems include a lack of fishing resources along our coasts; Chinese fishing boats that overfish in our national waters; a great drop in the number of migratory fish; shrinking international waters and falling quotas allotted to the fishing industry; the hijacking of Taiwanese fishing boats by pirates; an increase in equipment costs; fewer companies in supporting industries; an aging workforce that has hit production volume and necessitated the use of large numbers of foreign fishermen; a deterioration in conditions on fish farms; the proliferation of pests; damage to farmed fish from extreme weather and natural disasters; slow sales and increased competition from cheap fish products from overseas.
Taiwan’s fishermen should consider carefully just who is being real and who is putting on a show. They should be sure about who is really doing things for them and then cast their votes accordingly. This is the only way they can protect their livelihood.
Du Yu is a member of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US