Newspapers have reported the story of a woman named Chang Yi-jung (張旖容), who took it upon herself to search for letters written by her maternal grandfather Huang Wen-kung (黃溫恭) to his wife before he was executed in 1953, during the period of repression known as the White Terror.
Chang discovered that her grandfather had written five wills, which he wanted to be given to his wife. Sadly, this wish was not carried out and it was not until 2009, 56 years later, that Huang’s granddaughter found his last letters, by which time Huang’s wife was losing her mental faculties and was unable to understand her late husband’s final wishes.
Chang should be admired for her determination to uncover the truth. As the granddaughter of a victim of political repression, she has three demands. First, she calls on the government to make an inventory of items belonging to victims and to trace their surviving relatives and return these items to them. Second, she wants the authorities to go through the archives of various departments and to establish a legal basis for the transfer of documents when government departments are dissolved. Third, she wants a formal apology.
Former South African president Nelson Mandela is also a victim of political repression, having spent 27 years in prison for his beliefs and actions. When Mandela was released from jail, the South African government returned his prison writings to him. In Taiwan, the National Archives Administration (NAM) once held an exhibition of documents related to the Kaohsiung Incident in 1979, at which it exhibited private letters written by former political prisoner Shih Ming-teh (施明德), who later served as chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party. Shih objected to the fact that those writings had not been returned to him, but were instead put on show without his permission.
As the national department in charge of archives in Taiwan, the national archives should respond to Chang’s two archive-related demands by checking the records of all departments connected with political repression and the White Terror, and make a complete inventory of documents related to victims of political repression, including letters, confessions, wills and private notes written by them, or about them, when they were under investigation and imprisoned. The archives should also instruct all departments to inform surviving relatives about these documents so that they can claim them.
When it comes to departments that have been dissolved, such as the Taiwan Garrison Command, the national archives should make an inventory of the archives itself, as Chang has suggested. Laws and regulations relating to the transfer of archives should be reviewed and amended if necessary. If private writings or personal items belonging to victims of repression are found among the archives of these disbanded departments, surviving relatives should likewise be informed so that they can claim them.
This year marks the centenary of the Republic of China, and it is time to examine and reflect on the wrongful victimization of people for their political beliefs in the not-too-distant past. Past wrongs cannot be changed, but the future is in our hands. Chang suggested building a wall bearing the names of the perpetrators of repression, which would serve as a warning. It would be equally worthy to build a wall of remembrance bearing the names of the victims, perhaps in the Jingmei Human Rights Memorial and Cultural Park in Taipei. It would remind people of past wrongs, and alert this and future generations to the importance of preventing such tragedies from ever happening again.
Hsueh Li-kuei is a professor at the Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS