It is a familiar story in Taiwan. First there was an oversupply of eggs, and now the price of bananas and papayas has tumbled, hitting farmers’ incomes. Government leaders are calling on ministries to help out by buying up and using the goods, and they say they will work to boost exports. Once again, China has said it is willing to help out by buying more of the produce that is not selling well in Taiwan.
Prices for these fruit crops will normalize eventually. However, the problem remains that Taiwan seems particularly susceptible to this kind of glut, which happens year after year and even more often. People wonder why the government does not implement a long-term system for keeping production and prices stable, instead of stepping in with short-term stopgap measures each time a crisis hits.
Big fluctuations in farm produce prices have widespread effects, one of which is contributing to an overall rise in the cost of living. One measure the government has taken to stabilize farm produce prices is the so-called “95 system,” meaning that any time the bulk price for fruit or vegetables falls below a specified level, the authorities agree to protect farmers’ basic incomes by buying the produce at a price equal to 95 percent of production costs.
This is paid for out of the government’s budget. The problem is that this system is only a remedial one, kicking in once the problem already exists. Moreover, the purchase price is less than the cost of production, so farmers still take a loss. Consequently, farmers are not enthusiastic about signing up for such a plan, which basically addresses a symptom, not the cause.
Taiwanese farmers have long faced the problem of disequilibrium between production and sales, and the key to finding an effective solution is to figure out how to reduce or eliminate the factor of irrational decision-making by farmers. Farmers try to anticipate future prices and market demand and on that basis they decide the types and quantities of produce they are going to grow.
When they do not have access to sufficient information, they are bound to be unsure about what to produce, and that is why we often see farmers all rushing to plant one crop or another. If we could set up an effective channel for information about the market for agricultural produce, it would definitely help farmers make timely forecasts about market demand and decide what to grow accordingly.
Given that information technology is widespread in Taiwan, it should be possible to use the Internet and other media to present daily aggregate reports on prices and supply for the main kinds of agricultural produce. Making this information open and transparent would reduce opportunities for artificial manipulation and quell irrational speculation.
Although the government has started to promote electronic commerce for farm produce, there is still much room for improvement in quality and safety standards, logistics and delivery, and the training of expert modern “e-farmers.”
With instances of extreme weather becoming increasingly common, farm production around the world is facing ever-greater risks. Taiwan should improve its agriculture-oriented weather forecasting as well as improving farmers’ ability to respond.
The ideal way to manage agricultural production and marketing would be to implement planned production, with mandatory registration of who is producing what, although this would be difficult to implement in practice. In the past, the government promoted “planned production” of the kinds of produce that are often overproduced and unsellable.
Under this system, farmers had to inform the government how much land they were using for each crop before they started planting, and whenever the planting area for a particular crop exceeded a trigger level, the government would assist them to grow other crops instead. The problem here lies with the special features of agricultural production and the limited effectiveness of market-economy mechanisms.
A more practical way would be to apply the 80/20 principle, focusing management efforts on finding ways to keep tabs on those core farmers who account for 80 percent of total production, and then applying modern scientific management methods to keep price fluctuations within an acceptable range. That would probably be more effective than the system that we have at present, under which farmers can choose whether to register.
At the same time, we could set up a complementary rapid-response system incorporating monitoring, announcement, a scale of alarms and emergency response. Laws should also be amended to impose heavier penalties on profiteers who use illegal means to drive up farm produce prices. To deal with the problem effectively, it must be tackled from various angles at the same time.
Some advanced countries such as Japan, where land resources are rather limited, the US and Canada are investing a lot of money and technical know-how in developing plant factories and making them commercially viable. Plant factories have the advantage of producing a steady supply of crops all year round and satisfying consumers’ desire for food safety. Prices for crops grown in plant factories are about 20 to 30 percent higher than for regular produce. However, this price is not too high for consumers to accept, so the commercial potential is huge.
The Industrial Technology Research Institute recently got together with more than 20 businesses and academic research institutions, including optoelectronics firms Epistar and Everlight Electronics, Taiwan Fertilizer, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology and National Taiwan University to establish the Taiwan Plant Factory Industry Development Association, with the purpose of researching and developing technology and equipment in this new field.
Actually, government-run agricultural laboratories and research stations have more research talent available than anywhere else. If these people were called upon to assist in the plant factory project, it would shorten the research and development stage and give Taiwan a competitive advantage.
Facing the problems of abnormal farm-produce price fluctuations, frequent natural disasters and associated considerations, the government cannot keep on relying on stopgap measures like financial relief and the plowing under of unmarketable crops — or asking China to buy them up — which often only lead to further problems.
Besides setting up a long-term, effective system for stabilizing farm produce prices, the government needs to think and act creatively. Innovation is essential if we are to find new prospects for Taiwan’s farming sector.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US