There were two reminders this week that the oft-touted Chinese bonanza that Taiwan was supposed to reap from the government’s steamroller drive toward closer cross-strait ties might not be quite the pot of gold so many have claimed or hoped. Despite its linguistic and cultural ties, it appears Taiwan is simply the latest country to be taken in by the “billion-dollar Chinese market” mirage.
The Tourism Bureau announced on Thursday that Chinese tourist arrivals were down 30 percent last month compared with June last year, while May had seen a 16 percent drop from the year before. A Ministry of Education official said 975 Chinese students would enroll at private universities for the fall semester, although 2,141 slots had been approved and schools had accepted 1,263.
Many reasons have been given for the reduction in tourists: everything from health and safety worries — the plasticizer scare and the Alishan (阿里山) derailment — to renewed competition from neighboring countries, while the low student turnout was blamed on a lack of publicity. More worrying was the comment from an associate professor at Tamkang University, who said more than 1,000 Chinese high schools had a single token graduate apply for a spot at a Taiwanese school — an indication that without pressure from Beijing, Taiwan might be seeing only 200 or 300 students this fall, if any.
However, the truth of the matter is that the number of potential tourists, just like the number of potential students, has always been unrealistic, as have the expectations that an influx of Chinese tourists would rejuvenate the economy.
Official statistics showed there were 1.63 million Chinese visitors last year, or an average of 4,560 a day — more than the 3,000 daily limit when Taiwan first opened its doors to Chinese tour groups in mid-2008, but a far cry from the revised quota of 7,200 or the 10,000 a day President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) once envisioned. Likewise, the launch of the Chinese free independent travel program is unlikely to achieve the touted 90,000 visitors by the end of this year.
When regular cross-strait charter flights were announced in June 2008, it turned out none of the Chinese airlines involved were interested in flights to Kaohsiung and only one wanted to fly to Hualien. Lawmakers and local leaders in central and southern Taiwan complained that they were being overlooked, but the truth was and is that what Chinese tourists want to see first are the big attractions — the National Palace Museum and Taipei 101 in Taipei, Alishan, Sun Moon Lake and Taroko Gorge. It is the same the world over — just as tourists to China head straight for the Forbidden City and the Great Wall, while visitors to Egypt focus on Cairo and the pyramids.
There are many other things to see in those countries, but when travelers are making their first visit to a country and time is short, they want to see the sites that everyone knows.
Ministry of Education and university officials, likewise, should not have been surprised that most of the Chinese students wanted to go to schools in Taipei and none were interested in National Penghu University of Science and Technology.
If Taiwan really wants to compete in the Chinese market, whether for tourists or students, it is going to have to tailor its offerings to what the Chinese want. That means accepting that Taipei will remain the top spot for first-time visitors.
However, Greater Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu’s (陳菊) idea of turning the Republic of China (ROC) Military Academy, the ROC Air Force Academy and the ROC Naval Academy in her city into must-sees for Chinese tourists should be left on the drawing board. The “special interest” Chinese tourists who would rush to see those institutions are probably not the ones we want to be encouraging.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past