In 1987, before former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) enacted a policy allowing retired soldiers to return to China to visit relatives, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) secretary-general Lee Huan (李煥) sought out Robert Lai (賴義雄), a member of the dangwai (outside the party) movement, who was in Taipei at the time, for his opinion on the proposed policy.
Lai said that based on humanitarian principles, retired soldiers should be allowed to return to China to visit their relatives. The next day, a headline in a prominent “anti-communist” newspaper reported that an overseas dissident supported the policy.
It is quite obvious why the KMT decided to use endorsement of the policy by a well-known “dissident” as a selling point. However, this little vignette also highlights an important point: Even if Chiang was an unelected authoritarian ruler, he still wanted Taiwanese to trust him and worried that the policy would increase suspicions that he was selling out Taiwan.
Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), a former secretary to Chiang, talks about “no unification and no independence,” he holds his father’s dying words to “eventually unify” Taiwan with China close to his heart. He also accepts Beijing’s “one China” policy and treats the status of Taiwan as an internal Chinese affair as he struggles to improve cross-strait relations within the framework of the Chinese Civil War.
Ma received a Western education, but he ignores the fact that democracy is about responding to public opinion. He is a second-generation Mainlander, but he ignores the fact that Taiwanese are worried that a “foreign” elite is selling out Taiwan and blatantly disregards how his opinions tie Taiwan, over which Beijing does not have sovereignty, to China.
Some commentators have accused Ma of narcissism, stubbornness, shamelessness and arrogance to the point of his being ignorant and insensitive. Now that he is seeking re-election, Ma is dropping Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) in favor of a new running mate, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), because he thinks Wu has “a good way with words” and is full of “understanding and compassion for the public.”
Understanding people is nothing but the innate character of a kind person — it is not as rare as Ma might believe; indeed the streets are full of people who care for one another.
In addition, “having a good way with words” should mean the ability to communicate honestly with the public. However, Wu’s true talent lies in putting on a sincere face while avoiding difficult questions with cunning, downplaying serious issues, blaming everything on the pan-green camp, shirking responsibility and talking about policies in a way that the average person cannot comprehend, as was the case with his “grassroots economy.” These traits have not unreasonably given him a reputation for being a liar.
Ma has read the four Confucian classics, so he should know that Wu’s “way with words” is something Confucius disliked, as can be seen in the expression: “People fond of sweet talk or rhetoric are seldom benevolent or helpful.”
How can such a person be full of “understanding and compassion for the public”?
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), who was begged to stay on in his position, was quoted in an angry tone as saying that the pairing of Ma and Wu for the upcoming elections would be a “good mix.” Stubborn ignorance and insensitivity mixed with sweet talk and rhetoric are indeed a match made in heaven.
James Wang is a commentator based in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS