In 1987, before former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) enacted a policy allowing retired soldiers to return to China to visit relatives, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) secretary-general Lee Huan (李煥) sought out Robert Lai (賴義雄), a member of the dangwai (outside the party) movement, who was in Taipei at the time, for his opinion on the proposed policy.
Lai said that based on humanitarian principles, retired soldiers should be allowed to return to China to visit their relatives. The next day, a headline in a prominent “anti-communist” newspaper reported that an overseas dissident supported the policy.
It is quite obvious why the KMT decided to use endorsement of the policy by a well-known “dissident” as a selling point. However, this little vignette also highlights an important point: Even if Chiang was an unelected authoritarian ruler, he still wanted Taiwanese to trust him and worried that the policy would increase suspicions that he was selling out Taiwan.
Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), a former secretary to Chiang, talks about “no unification and no independence,” he holds his father’s dying words to “eventually unify” Taiwan with China close to his heart. He also accepts Beijing’s “one China” policy and treats the status of Taiwan as an internal Chinese affair as he struggles to improve cross-strait relations within the framework of the Chinese Civil War.
Ma received a Western education, but he ignores the fact that democracy is about responding to public opinion. He is a second-generation Mainlander, but he ignores the fact that Taiwanese are worried that a “foreign” elite is selling out Taiwan and blatantly disregards how his opinions tie Taiwan, over which Beijing does not have sovereignty, to China.
Some commentators have accused Ma of narcissism, stubbornness, shamelessness and arrogance to the point of his being ignorant and insensitive. Now that he is seeking re-election, Ma is dropping Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) in favor of a new running mate, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), because he thinks Wu has “a good way with words” and is full of “understanding and compassion for the public.”
Understanding people is nothing but the innate character of a kind person — it is not as rare as Ma might believe; indeed the streets are full of people who care for one another.
In addition, “having a good way with words” should mean the ability to communicate honestly with the public. However, Wu’s true talent lies in putting on a sincere face while avoiding difficult questions with cunning, downplaying serious issues, blaming everything on the pan-green camp, shirking responsibility and talking about policies in a way that the average person cannot comprehend, as was the case with his “grassroots economy.” These traits have not unreasonably given him a reputation for being a liar.
Ma has read the four Confucian classics, so he should know that Wu’s “way with words” is something Confucius disliked, as can be seen in the expression: “People fond of sweet talk or rhetoric are seldom benevolent or helpful.”
How can such a person be full of “understanding and compassion for the public”?
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), who was begged to stay on in his position, was quoted in an angry tone as saying that the pairing of Ma and Wu for the upcoming elections would be a “good mix.” Stubborn ignorance and insensitivity mixed with sweet talk and rhetoric are indeed a match made in heaven.
James Wang is a commentator based in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
RSS