A key development goal to halve the number of people without access to basic sanitation by 2015 will be missed because donor countries have diverted aid money away from unglamorous water projects, according to the World Bank and the charity WaterAid.
Aid to give people in developing countries access to clean water and sanitation has been shrinking as a proportion of global aid budgets, new research has shown, with the result that more than 1 billion people will not get the help they were promised by rich countries under the Millennium Development Goals.
Instead, donors are restricting aid to projects such as schools and hospitals — even though the benefits of those are diminished if their recipients have no clean water or toilets.
If the millennium goals were reached, of the 2.6 billion people without access to sanitation today, at least 1.7 billion would be equipped with decent facilities by 2015, but on current trends, only about 700 million will gain such access in the time frame.
“It shows how far water and sanitation have slipped down the list of donor priorities,” said John Garrett, senior policy analyst at WaterAid, which compiled the research using information from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
“Yet the global sanitation crisis is so massive — this is totally insufficient to tackle the problem,” he said.
This lack of effort on water and sanitation is also having an effect on the economies of developing countries, which can be quantified for the first time. The World Bank has recently shown that more than 6 percent a year is being wiped off the GDP of countries failing to provide their citizens with adequate sanitation, because of health effects and the resulting lack of education and work opportunities.
“When you think that 2 percent of GDP is the difference between growth and recession, we are having the equivalent of three recessions every year in these places, but no one is taking any notice,” said Julia Bucknall, the World Bank’s water chief. “It’s astounding.”
Women and girls are hardest hit by the failure to provide water and sanitation, a newly published study by the World Bank has shown, because they are more likely to be responsible for water collection. Time spent fetching water is spent away from school or other productive activities. The bank found that a 15-minute reduction in the time spent collecting water increased the proportion of girls attending school in Ghana by between 8 percent and 12 percent.
Water and sanitation projects shrank as a proportion of total aid in the last 20 years, according to research from WaterAid that is scheduled to be published next month.
In the mid-1990s, water and sanitation made up about 8 percent of global financial aid, putting it ahead of issues such as reproductive health and population growth, but between 2007 and 2009 — the last year for which comprehensive figures are available — it was just over 5 percent.
Investing in water and decent sanitation has been found to be one of the most effective uses of development aid. The UN estimates that every US$1 spent on sanitation reaps an economic benefit of at least US$9 because of improvements to health and because it frees people to be more economically active.
Although more aid is being devoted to water and sanitation in absolute terms than in the 1990s — about US$8 billion last year compared with US$4 billion to US$5 billion — that comes against a background in which aid spending as a whole has increased markedly. The diminishing proportion of aid devoted to sanitation shows donors’ unwilling to address what is seen as a difficult and unglamorous area of policy, according to people working in the field.
“It just does not attract donor funding,” Bucknall said.
“It seems to be easier for people to talk about disease and ignore sanitation,” she said.
Jae So, manager of the water and sanitation program at the World Bank, said at least US$7 billion a year is being lost in economic productivity in southeast Asian countries through neglect of the issue.
The majority of the losses in some areas come not from the ill health, but tourism.
“Tourists don’t want to come if they think they might have contaminated water or inadequate sewage. It’s a huge lost economic opportunity,” So said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers