The recent sexual misconduct allegation involving an aide to Taiwan’s representative to Fiji no doubt came as a scandalous shock to many, rocking diplomatic circles and casting a negative light on his diplomatic duty, which is supposed to be to uphold and promote a positive image of Taiwan. The subsequent so-called punitive action meted out by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs comes across as equally shocking, to say the least. Handing First Secretary Leon Liu (劉壽軒) two mere demerits for “improper physical actions” seems to indicate a lack of seriousness at the ministry concerning a matter that has severely damaged the nation’s name and image.
While groping a female employee without her consent already constitutes severe misconduct, Liu offered the ridiculous excuse that he wanted to “investigate the breast shape of women from the South Pacific islands.”
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) said on Tuesday that he was truly saddened by the incident, pointing out that diplomatic officials are different from ordinary people in that they represent the country and that any misconduct would hurt the nation’s image and dignity.
Yang said he had decided to hand out “more severe” disciplinary measures for Liu over the matter. However, if giving Liu two demerits constitutes “more severe” disciplinary action in dealing with the matter, it would raise serious doubts over the standards the ministry has adopted in handing out disciplinary action.
As documents the Trade Mission of the Republic of China sent to the Republic of the Fiji Islands suggest the incident has been settled out of court with 5,000 Fijian dollars (US$2,840) paid to the local employee, this raises the question whether it was the result of Liu’s superior, Taiwan’s Representative to Fiji Victor Chin (秦日新), working to cover up Liu’s alleged escapades.
Adding more damage to Taiwan’s international reputation is the allegation against Chin himself, who, in addition to having been accused of misusing public funds, is alleged to have been having an affair with a Japanese woman who worked at the Japanese embassy in Fiji.
While Chin has flatly denied having an extramarital affair — the issue remains under investigation — the slew of alleged scandalous irregularities begs the question: What has gone wrong with the nation’s diplomatic workers?
Given Taiwan’s dire diplomatic situation as a result of China’s persisting obstruction, Taiwanese diplomats have their work cut out for them abroad and the hard work of many should not be overshadowed by the incidents that allegedly took place at the Fiji mission.
However, under President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “diplomatic truce,” in which Taipei no longer competes with Beijing for diplomatic allies, the allegations about what has been happening in Fiji seem to indicate that the nation’s public servants stationed abroad are being left with too much time on their hands with nothing better to do but fill their time with personal social affairs while on the taxpayers’ payroll. This could result in incompetent and despicable public servants — rather than those working toward improving bilateral relations — creating the lasting impression of Taiwan in the countries in which they are posted.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS