A recently published report comparing the difference in salaries between university professors and elementary-school teachers has caused quite a stir.
Strictly speaking, compared with salaries for university professors in developed regions of the world, Taiwanese professpors seem to get a relatively raw deal, at least in terms of the salary figures. This has caused a certain amount of concern among academics at Academia Sinica, who see higher salaries in other countries luring the nation’s best researchers abroad. Actually, these fears are not entirely unfounded. A very accomplished former colleague of mine succumbed to pressure and moved to Hong Kong only last year, where salaries are about three times those in Taiwan and substantial housing subsidies are included.
However, how far one can stretch one’s salary has much to do with one’s own values and the place in which one lives. If one really wants to compare the salaries of university professors in Taiwan with those in other countries, one needs to go beyond looking at the numbers on the page and take into account many other variables that apply to those respective countries, such as the average salary, the cost of living, tax and fringe benefits.
Only when these factors have been accounted for can an assessment be made whether university professors’ salaries in Taiwan are too low and, if one thinks they are, where one should look for an adequate comparison. In the US, for instance, university professors’ salaries are not consistent across the board, either between different institutions or for individuals within one university. Some universities do not offer as much money, per se, but they often provide generous perks, such as covering health insurance (not cheap in the US) and providing accommodation and free childcare facilities — things which significantly reduce household expenditure.
Of course, it is also necessary to look at professors’ teaching and research duties at universities abroad and how their workload compares with professors at Taiwanese universities.
The biggest problem with university professors’ salaries — and indeed with the salaries of all public servants — is the lack of geographical or performance-related weighting: Salary levels are the same everywhere for a teacher or professor of a given position, irrespective of what part of the country they live, how high the cost of living is, how local housing prices compare or their own experience and academic achievements.
A friend of mine teaches at National Taiwan University. He bought an apartment of not even 100m2 in area in an old building for NT$14 million (US$483,000). That is equal to about 12 years of his current salary. That same amount of money where I live in Hualien would have bought a free-standing villa of about 330m2.
To make the monthly mortgage payments of more than NT$40,000, my friend has to supplement his basic salary of a little more than NT$80,000 by accepting outside projects, giving talks and grading examination papers. We both do the same job, yet while my friend struggles in Taipei on his salary, I get by on mine in Hualien.
Yes, it is possible to say the salary is too low, but really one should not generalize. Two people on the same salary can have radically different experiences, depending on their individual circumstances.
Nothing is black and white. Therefore, this matter needs to be studied before we can state convincingly whether university professors’ salaries in Taiwan are low or high, how such a comparison should be made, or whether salaries should be raised or redistributed.
Hsu Yu-fang is an associate professor in National Dong Hwa University’s Department of Sinophone Literature.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US