In an interview with the Associated Press (AP) in October last year, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) revealed that he planned to conclude political agreements with China during his second term. Ma was forced to deny the report, ascribing the claims about his unification plot to a translation error on the part of the AP.
However, when he received German politician Hermann Otto Solms on June 14, Ma promoted his “mutual non-recognition of sovereignty and mutual non-denial of jurisdiction” with Beijing, erroneously comparing his hush-hush reconciliation with China to the 1972 Basic Treaty between West and East Germany.
Ma’s aspiration to force Taiwan to unite with China never wanes. He seems obsessed with legitimating unification.
After World War II, the occupation authorities in West Germany represented the nation’s highest diplomatic and military power from the defeat of the Third Reich on June 5, 1945, to the conclusion of the Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany on Sept. 12, 1990.
In the Declaration Regarding the Defeat of Germany and the Assumption of Supreme Authority by Allied Powers, issued on June 5, 1945, the Allies confirmed that the US, UK, USSR and the Provisional Government of the French Republic assumed “supreme authority with respect to Germany, including all the powers possessed by the German Government.”
West Germany started rebuilding in 1946. The occupation authorities first established the Lander, or states, during 1946 and 1947, then military governments guided the Lander with the Frankfurt Documents, derived from the principles laid down at the Six Powers London Conference on June 7, 1948. The Frankfurt Documents consisted of three documents: Constituent Assembly, Land Boundaries and Occupation Statute. The military governors retained the power to “conduct or direct for the time being Germany’s foreign relations” and “ensure the observance of the constitutions which they have approved.” The Allies allowed the Lander to draft a federal constitution for West Germany. The Basic Law came into force, which led to the establishment of the Federal Republic of Germany. West Germany and East Germany were simultaneously admitted to the UN on Sept. 13, 1973.
Not until Sept. 12, 1990, when the occupant authorities renounced their legal powers over Germany in the Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany was Germany’s full sovereignty restored. It took 46 years to rebuild Germany.
Neither of the two Germanys had full sovereignty in 1972. At that point, exchanges between the two were conducted not as domestic affairs, but in the context of partition occupation, the related military governments, the diplomacy of Federal Germany to East Europe and even changing West-East relations, which went from confrontation to detente during the 1960s and 1970s.
Clearly, the case of Germany is very different to that of the Republic of China (ROC) and the People’s Republic of China. Despite that, and his doctorate in international law, Ma made the implausible inference that the exiled Chinese regime in Taipei is able to overstep the legitimate authority of the Principal Occupying Power stipulated in the Allies’ Treaty of Peace with Japan in 1951. He mistakenly appears to believe that Taipei and Beijing can decide the status of Formosa and the Pescadores at will.
Ma seems to appreciate the history of the Federal Republic of Germany, but he still needs to engage with Beijing by honoring relevant international treaties and understanding the ROC no longer exists in a legitimate sense. He also needs to accept the status quo of Formosa and the Pescadores, and stand by the the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the US and Japan.
HoonTing is an independent researcher focusing on the issue of Taiwan’s status.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking