On June 2, there was a celebration for the 60th anniversary of Radio Free Europe’s first broadcasts to Czechoslovakia. Back in the early 1950s, the Iron Curtain had come down, separating the central and eastern European nations from the free West.
The broadcasts by Radio Free Europe represented a ray of hope for the people suffering under the repressive communist regimes and presented them with balanced and open reporting on developments around the world.
However, the June 2 celebration showed that it took about 40 years until the regimes fell in the late 1980s, requiring much patience, persistence and perseverance from both those engaged in the broadcasts, as well as the people in Czechoslovakia and other countries.
Events also showed that few people saw the transition coming: Even as late as the mid-1980s, prominent Russia watchers predicted that the then-Soviet Union was here to stay. However, nothing was further from the truth and in late 1989 the Berlin Wall fell, the people in Czechoslovakia had their Velvet Revolution and a new dawn took place for the people in those countries.
In this new age, many people who suffered under the repression and restrictions of the old communist regimes testified to the success of the broadcasts by Radio Free Europe that had made all the difference in keeping up their hopes for a better future.
This leads me to question the plans by the US government to scale down the Mandarin and Cantonese language short wave and satellite TV broadcasts of Voice of America (VOA). The proposal is to move to a Web-based system, making use of new technologies such as Facebook and Twitter.
While we indeed need to make good use of new technologies, we need to realize that — certainly in a developing society such as China (and certainly in the rural areas) — few people have access to the Internet and hundreds of millions of people still rely on “old” technologies such as short wave radio and satellite TV.
In addition, the communist rulers in Beijing have become adept at blocking Internet access whenever and wherever they want: Observers call it the “Great Firewall.”
What the US Broadcasting Board of Governors, which oversees VOA operations, is apparently envisioning is a CNN-style operation with a global newsroom that would send out its news via Web-based services and mobile phones. While CNN certainly has changed the broadcasting landscape with its instant news, what it lacks is substance and in-depth analysis.
The present set-up with specialized teams of experts for the various languages does provide for a more in-depth analysis of issues. I personally experienced this recently in the VOA program Issues and Opinions, where we spent an entire hour discussing Taiwan’s upcoming elections with listeners from China — as detailed in a recent article (“Chinese Views on Taiwan’s Elections,” May 26, page 8). In a CNN style operation, this would have been reduced to a 10-second sound bite.
The need to maintain or even expand the VOA Mandarin and Cantonese services is also illustrated by the fact that China’s state media, including Xinhua news agency, China Central Television (CCTV), the People’s Daily and China Radio International, are vastly expanding their propaganda operations.
So, if we don’t watch out, the voice of freedom in China will be drowned out and the people still suffering under the restrictions behind the “Bamboo Curtain” will not see a new dawn like their counterparts did, in eastern Europe only 20 years ago.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS