The five-day World Health Assembly (WHA) has ended and Taiwan’s delegation has returned. Apart from making a minor complaint about Taiwan’s designation as a part of China used to take part in the assembly, the government seems to be very happy about this year’s attendance.
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration said it cherished the opportunity and expressed gratitude for being able to take part, and repeatedly referred to the “inroads” made by attending. Ma said he hoped the model for Taiwan’s participation in the WHA could be applied to other international organizations and that Taiwanese would appreciate the hard-won results that would secure more benefits for the country. How can he be so wrong, over and over again?
The inroads the government kept referring to include having Taiwan’s name changed from “Taiwan, China” into “Chinese Taipei,” being elevated to “observer” status and being allowed to attend the WHA instead of only technical meetings. However, these inroads are all contingent on prior agreement by China. In fact, if Beijing were willing, it could also allow the Hong Kong and Macau special administrative regions to take part in the events in the same manner it “allows” “Chinese Taipei” to do so. How can the government let Taiwan’s participation in international organizations be dictated by China?
The government has been bragging about taking part in more than 200 related meetings and the “direct contacts” it has made. However, compared with Taiwan’s participation in international organizations prior to 2008, a big change occurred after 2009: Whether it is the WHA or other meetings, the WHO has made it clear that Taiwan’s delegations represent “Taiwan, Province of China.” Neither the government nor the attendees protested against this. The more Taiwan participates on these conditions, the more China’s territorial claims to Taiwan will be consolidated, which will only see the erosion of Taiwanese independence.
On the surface, it would seem that allowing Taiwan to use the name “Chinese Taipei” for five days at the WHA was a sign of goodwill, but the leaked classified documents from the WHO Secretariat reveals the ill intent behind this.
Apart from the WHA, Taiwan is participating in a plethora of international organizations under the name “Chinese Taipei,” both as a member and as an observer. However, Chinese approval is not required for participation in any of these organizations, nor are prior consultations with Beijing. And while China keeps denying that “Chinese Taipei” is a country, none of these organizations have issued documents saying “Taiwan is a province of China.”
More importantly, Taiwan had never before kept quiet or failed to protest against Chinese claims that it was a province of China. However, since 2009, Taiwan’s participation in the WHA and related events has been based on the tacit acceptance of the premise that it is a province of China.
An analysis based on international law reveals at least three problems with this mode of participation. First, it gives rise to concerns that Taiwan is committed to the view that it is part of China and risks getting caught up in the Chinese framework wherein there is “one China” with three special administrative regions. Second, all Taiwanese participation in international organizations will be decided by China, and Taiwan will only be notified that its attendance is allowed. Conversely, Taiwan will be cut off from all participation that China does not approve. And third, by referring to Taiwan as “Chinese Taipei,” it is more likely that Taiwan will also be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” in international organizations in which it has independent member status.
The previous administration was aware that the model for taking part in the WHO belittled Taiwan’s status as a nation, with former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) protesting loudly and ordering his delegation to protest the name issue. Now, however, government aides and staff are avoiding these important issues, concentrating on less serious issues in their legal analysis and misleading the public with these trifles. Perhaps it is because the presidential and legislative elections are around the corner, and the government cannot admit that the model for WHA participation in 2009 was a serious diplomatic mistake. Instead, it has said it wants to apply the WHA model to participation in all international organizations. The Hoklo (otherwise known as Taiwanese) phrase about “being kidnapped and sold off and then helping your captors count the money” (讓人賣了還替人數鈔票) comes to mind here.
The sovereignty issue is very complex and it may be hard for the general public, as well as medical and public health experts, to fully comprehend its significance, but why can’t those in power sort these things out better?
The government should at least be able to respond to these issues and make an appropriate statement to the public to the effect that neither the WHO nor any other UN organization can decide Taiwan’s status and that Taiwan refuses to acknowledge the status decided on by the secretariat.
As for expanding the WHA model to other organizations, the government should rein in its horses before it is too late.
Chiang Huang-chih is a professor of law at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers