a confidential WHO memo directing internal references to Taiwan as a “Province of China” was leaked, causing concern and anger among the public. The government said that it would “vigorously protest” the directive. Maybe something was lost in translation, or perhaps someone is trying to pull the wool over our eyes, but the Chinese phrase “our country” (我國) was not fully represented in the English version. They got the “we” part in there, but neglected to use the word “country.” Neither did they, by the way, state that Taiwan was not a province of China.
The government under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has turned disingenuousness into an art form, although this time it has been found out. Addressing an issue involving national identity, they quietly delivered the protest, afraid to openly state our sovereign status. How is this “vigorously protesting” the issue? No, if they want to deceive, they should go all the way and, for the sake of consistency, simply dress it all up with the nice-sounding term huolu kangyi (活路抗議). One could translate this as “life-giving protest,” although I’m sure they would prefer the term “flexible protest,” as we shall see below.
Everyone wants to live longer, and people will do what they can to ensure this. This leaves them vulnerable to quacks flogging false cure-alls on the back of professed life-extending properties and explains why this quack administration is trying to fool people with its idea of a “life-giving diplomacy” (huolu waijiao, 活路外交).
Really, the charlatan who came up with that term should be given the Confucius Peace Prize. Well done. The palpable feel-good factor it produces conceals the fanciful nature of what it ostensibly offers. There is no infallible panacea, just as there’s no such thing as a free lunch. And if it is going to postpone the end, there’s no mention of how long for. What exactly is this secret formula, anyway? The English text is quite laughable. Ma uses the phrase “flexible democracy,” although that would be something completely different in Chinese.
Ma promotes his “life-giving diplomacy” although for some reason the Chinese term doesn’t appear in the bilingual glossary provided on the Presidential Office’s official Web site. This betrays a degree of diffidence on the government’s part. The glossary does, however, include the words “flexibility” (linghuo, 靈活) and “autonomy” (zizhu, 自主). It seems the Ma administration is failing to give itself enough credit. It also makes one suspect it is trying to hoodwink the public.
So the Presidential Office translates linghuo as “flexibility.” Why not have “flexible diplomacy” as linghuo waijiao (靈活外交) then? Why use the Chinese word for “life-giving,” suggesting a cure-all elixir?
In Chinese, the word for “autonomy” is normally paired with that for “independence.” It is a common collocation. Ma, however, uses the word for “autonomy” in isolation, putting Taiwan’s status on a par with the “autonomous regions” of Tibet and Hong Kong.
Diplomacy is a tool for protecting national sovereignty and the possibility of compromise inherent in flexibility is integral to its operation. Presidents in Taiwan, from the days of Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) to the pro-Taiwan, pro-localization Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), have all applied a degree of flexibility to how the country was referred to internationally, but certainly not to the extent that this would mean sacrificing sovereignty
Overseeing the destruction of the nation’s identity and sacrificing one’s sovereignty is capitulation, not flexibility; a recipe for extinction, not an elixir of life. People who cannot differentiate the two and regard surrender as a successful outcome are not qualified to be treated as Taiwanese.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past