On May 4, Council of Indigenous Peoples Minister Sun Ta-chuan (孫大川) presented a report to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee on ethnic development and autonomy for Aborigines. Saying that Aborigines had interbred with other ethnic groups, Liao Wan-lung (廖萬隆), a member of the committee, wondered whether it would be possible to discourage intermarriage between Aborigines and other ethnicities to ensure the preservation of Aborigines’ cultural heritage.
When Liao finished, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is also the KMT chairman, replied that individuals were free to make their own decisions about whom they fell in love with and married, adding: “I am sorry, but I cannot comply.”
It goes without saying that Liao’s proposal incensed Aborigines, but so did Ma’s reply. Anyone hearing such blatant racial prejudice would be angry, and would have reprimanded Liao for his bigoted comments right on the spot. Even though Ma did not support Liao’s suggestion, such a tepid response simply did not go far enough.
Liao isn’t qualified to sit on the KMT Central Standing Committee. Ma should have slapped him down there and then or immediately referred him to the disciplinary committee. How could Ma justify dismissing the notion simply with some vague platitude about individual freedoms?
While people are allowed to express themselves freely within the committee, Liao’s words not only run counter to common sense, the Constitutional right of racial equality and the laws protecting the rights of Aborigines, they also managed, in one fell swoop, to bring the KMT’s policy on Aborigines crashing down at their feet.
The failure to adequately deal with Liao shows a lack of will within the KMT to shun overt racism. Perhaps this is because Liao’s comments represent what many within the KMT really think. Perhaps, deep down, the KMT regards blood and DNA as central to its legitimacy and governance over the hoi polloi.
Taiwan is a nation of migrants. The majority of Taiwanese are from families that moved to Taiwan, at some point or other, from various places. Taiwanese have also moved in the opposite direction, emigrating to various countries. Interracial propagation is a long-term process that happens in migratory societies.
The first waves of immigrants to Taiwan from China vied for space with the Aborigines living in the lowland areas and mountainous regions when they arrived, followed by farmers from Fujian Province and Hakka groups mixing with the Aborigines. Later, Taiwanese would struggle with their Japanese colonial masters and then, after the end of World War II, the KMT forces arrived from China. Each wave of immigration involved the spilling of blood, before the struggle between clashing ethnic groups calmed down and Taiwan slowly moved toward a state of racial harmony. Liao’s words, and his presumption of racial superiority, have reopened many of these old wounds. It was an unforgivable error.
Liao was forced to make a public apology after his comments were reported by the media and were met with strong protests by Aboriginal groups. Nevertheless, judging by the way both Liao and the KMT reacted, it’s clear that they remain unaware of what they did wrong and have merely relented in the face of external pressure to contain the fallout. They will be keeping their heads low until everything has blown over, but they will be back to their old ways.
This was a good opportunity for Ma and the KMT to come clean and address the issue of racism within the party, and they failed to take it. Liao is not the only one with such views within the KMT. This kind of attitude is sure to rear its ugly head somewhere down the line, and the next time the political and social cost will be even greater.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS