Three years ago, when the nation’s economy was facing heightened inflationary pressures driven by rising oil and food costs, the government was severely criticized over its measures to alleviate people’s financial pain. Good or bad, that year’s price pressure was later replaced by the US subprime mortgage problem and ensuing global financial crisis, and the public’s complaints against the government subsided accordingly.
This year, Taiwan, along with many Asian economies, is again facing higher consumer inflation, driven by a steady increase in food and energy prices. On Friday, a survey released by the Consumers’ Foundation showed that 60 percent of the 1,234 respondents said they felt strongly about the rise in commodity prices this year and about 57 percent of respondents said the government’s measures to deal with the price issue were insufficient.
So, is the government waiting for a global financial or economic crisis to come to its rescue again? It had better not.
The public has indeed been under increasing pressure from price rises recently, as the latest government data showed the average price of 16 key daily necessities — including flour, meat, eggs and vegetable oil — grew 3.6 percent year-on-year last month, compared with increases of 3.4 percent in March, 3.3 percent in February and 2.6 percent in January.
What’s more, growth in the core consumer price index (CPI) — which excludes vegetables, fruit and energy items — expanded slightly to 0.99 percent last month from a year ago, following an increase of 0.98 percent in March.
To help deal with inflation, the government is proposing a hike in civil servant pay and hoping that private-sector businesses will follow suit. The government has also lowered import tariffs on certain agricultural commodities and instructed the state-run oil refiner CPC Corp to partly absorb the rise in fuel costs to help stabilize prices, while the Fair Trade Commission has launched investigations to uncover unfair price increases.
However, the prices of oil and agricultural commodities are volatile and subject to global political turmoil and abnormal climatic phenomena like floods, droughts and storms. Against this backdrop, the central bank seems to have become more comfortable with watching the New Taiwan dollar appreciate as it seeks to contain inflation.
However, using a strong NT dollar to partially offset the gains in imported commodities has its limits, because this measure could harm the competitiveness of Taiwanese exports. Based on the central bank’s data, the NT dollar has appreciated by 5.5 percent against the US dollar so far this year, the largest rise among major Asian currencies. This compares with a 4.4 percent rise by the South Korean won.
The central bank has used interest rate adjustments to slow the price pressure over the past four quarters and it certainly should not surprise anyone if the central bank chooses another rate hike of 0.125 percentage points at next month’s quarterly board meeting. The problem is the central bank’s mild pace of rate hikes still lags behind the rising pace of commodity prices.
The impact of inflationary pressures driven by import costs is inescapable for Taiwan, as our economy is heavily dependent on imported industrial and agricultural raw materials. The government’s efforts to deal with price pressures, such as lower import tariffs, fuel subsidies and monetary policy adjustments, have been of limited effectiveness.
In fact, the most effective way to fight price pressure is for Taiwanese consumers to minimize their use of imported commodities, look for cost-efficient substitutes and carefully consider their options to cut costs. The government can help by making the market more fair and transparent as well as by better informing the public about the latest price changes.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
RSS