Three years ago, when the nation’s economy was facing heightened inflationary pressures driven by rising oil and food costs, the government was severely criticized over its measures to alleviate people’s financial pain. Good or bad, that year’s price pressure was later replaced by the US subprime mortgage problem and ensuing global financial crisis, and the public’s complaints against the government subsided accordingly.
This year, Taiwan, along with many Asian economies, is again facing higher consumer inflation, driven by a steady increase in food and energy prices. On Friday, a survey released by the Consumers’ Foundation showed that 60 percent of the 1,234 respondents said they felt strongly about the rise in commodity prices this year and about 57 percent of respondents said the government’s measures to deal with the price issue were insufficient.
So, is the government waiting for a global financial or economic crisis to come to its rescue again? It had better not.
The public has indeed been under increasing pressure from price rises recently, as the latest government data showed the average price of 16 key daily necessities — including flour, meat, eggs and vegetable oil — grew 3.6 percent year-on-year last month, compared with increases of 3.4 percent in March, 3.3 percent in February and 2.6 percent in January.
What’s more, growth in the core consumer price index (CPI) — which excludes vegetables, fruit and energy items — expanded slightly to 0.99 percent last month from a year ago, following an increase of 0.98 percent in March.
To help deal with inflation, the government is proposing a hike in civil servant pay and hoping that private-sector businesses will follow suit. The government has also lowered import tariffs on certain agricultural commodities and instructed the state-run oil refiner CPC Corp to partly absorb the rise in fuel costs to help stabilize prices, while the Fair Trade Commission has launched investigations to uncover unfair price increases.
However, the prices of oil and agricultural commodities are volatile and subject to global political turmoil and abnormal climatic phenomena like floods, droughts and storms. Against this backdrop, the central bank seems to have become more comfortable with watching the New Taiwan dollar appreciate as it seeks to contain inflation.
However, using a strong NT dollar to partially offset the gains in imported commodities has its limits, because this measure could harm the competitiveness of Taiwanese exports. Based on the central bank’s data, the NT dollar has appreciated by 5.5 percent against the US dollar so far this year, the largest rise among major Asian currencies. This compares with a 4.4 percent rise by the South Korean won.
The central bank has used interest rate adjustments to slow the price pressure over the past four quarters and it certainly should not surprise anyone if the central bank chooses another rate hike of 0.125 percentage points at next month’s quarterly board meeting. The problem is the central bank’s mild pace of rate hikes still lags behind the rising pace of commodity prices.
The impact of inflationary pressures driven by import costs is inescapable for Taiwan, as our economy is heavily dependent on imported industrial and agricultural raw materials. The government’s efforts to deal with price pressures, such as lower import tariffs, fuel subsidies and monetary policy adjustments, have been of limited effectiveness.
In fact, the most effective way to fight price pressure is for Taiwanese consumers to minimize their use of imported commodities, look for cost-efficient substitutes and carefully consider their options to cut costs. The government can help by making the market more fair and transparent as well as by better informing the public about the latest price changes.
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS