Three years ago, when the nation’s economy was facing heightened inflationary pressures driven by rising oil and food costs, the government was severely criticized over its measures to alleviate people’s financial pain. Good or bad, that year’s price pressure was later replaced by the US subprime mortgage problem and ensuing global financial crisis, and the public’s complaints against the government subsided accordingly.
This year, Taiwan, along with many Asian economies, is again facing higher consumer inflation, driven by a steady increase in food and energy prices. On Friday, a survey released by the Consumers’ Foundation showed that 60 percent of the 1,234 respondents said they felt strongly about the rise in commodity prices this year and about 57 percent of respondents said the government’s measures to deal with the price issue were insufficient.
So, is the government waiting for a global financial or economic crisis to come to its rescue again? It had better not.
The public has indeed been under increasing pressure from price rises recently, as the latest government data showed the average price of 16 key daily necessities — including flour, meat, eggs and vegetable oil — grew 3.6 percent year-on-year last month, compared with increases of 3.4 percent in March, 3.3 percent in February and 2.6 percent in January.
What’s more, growth in the core consumer price index (CPI) — which excludes vegetables, fruit and energy items — expanded slightly to 0.99 percent last month from a year ago, following an increase of 0.98 percent in March.
To help deal with inflation, the government is proposing a hike in civil servant pay and hoping that private-sector businesses will follow suit. The government has also lowered import tariffs on certain agricultural commodities and instructed the state-run oil refiner CPC Corp to partly absorb the rise in fuel costs to help stabilize prices, while the Fair Trade Commission has launched investigations to uncover unfair price increases.
However, the prices of oil and agricultural commodities are volatile and subject to global political turmoil and abnormal climatic phenomena like floods, droughts and storms. Against this backdrop, the central bank seems to have become more comfortable with watching the New Taiwan dollar appreciate as it seeks to contain inflation.
However, using a strong NT dollar to partially offset the gains in imported commodities has its limits, because this measure could harm the competitiveness of Taiwanese exports. Based on the central bank’s data, the NT dollar has appreciated by 5.5 percent against the US dollar so far this year, the largest rise among major Asian currencies. This compares with a 4.4 percent rise by the South Korean won.
The central bank has used interest rate adjustments to slow the price pressure over the past four quarters and it certainly should not surprise anyone if the central bank chooses another rate hike of 0.125 percentage points at next month’s quarterly board meeting. The problem is the central bank’s mild pace of rate hikes still lags behind the rising pace of commodity prices.
The impact of inflationary pressures driven by import costs is inescapable for Taiwan, as our economy is heavily dependent on imported industrial and agricultural raw materials. The government’s efforts to deal with price pressures, such as lower import tariffs, fuel subsidies and monetary policy adjustments, have been of limited effectiveness.
In fact, the most effective way to fight price pressure is for Taiwanese consumers to minimize their use of imported commodities, look for cost-efficient substitutes and carefully consider their options to cut costs. The government can help by making the market more fair and transparent as well as by better informing the public about the latest price changes.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS