The earthquake and tsunami related problems at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant have inspired endless commentary and speculation. Unfortunately, much of the debate about the disaster and its implications has been uninformed and problematic.
Radiation levels have increased by as much as 400 times the normal level 19.2km from the plant; increased radioactivity has been found in milk, fish and a variety of vegetables farmed in the region; and drinking water in Tokyo, 225km from Fukushima, has been declared unsuitable for consumption by infants. Several countries have banned imports of milk and vegetables from the affected region.
What are we to make of all this?
Radiation at these levels poses a minimal threat to human health for anyone outside the immediate area of the nuclear power station itself.
Most of the radiation is Iodine-131, which is good news for several reasons. First, this isotope has a short half-life — only about eight days — so it decays to negligible levels in a short time (in 10 weeks, less than 0.1 percent is left).
Second, it indicates that the source of the radiation is the reactor itself, rather than spent fuel rods (which harbor much longer-lived and more dangerous radioisotopes).
Third, a readily available and effective antidote exists for those at risk: non-radioactive iodine, available in tablets or liquid, which blocks the uptake of I-131 into the thyroid gland.
Moreover, limits for radioactivity in food commonly incorporate orders of magnitude of the margin of safety and are predicated on long-term ingestion. In addition, Japan’s limits for radiation exposure are even more conservative (ie, lower) than those set by international agencies.
Another factor that might mitigate radiation damage is a phenomenon called hormesis — a biphasic dose-response relationship in which something such as a toxic heavy metal or ionizing radiation that is harmful at moderate to high doses may actually produce adaptive beneficial effects at low doses.
In other words, we don’t see a completely linear relationship between the dose of the potential toxin and a deleterious effect; rather we see a distribution that looks something like a “check mark,” with concentration on the horizontal axis and some measure of damage on the vertical axis.
Hormesis is a byproduct of evolution. From the beginnings of life on earth, organisms have been exposed to potentially harsh conditions, with individual cells commonly exposed to toxic substances such as chemicals and radiation.
In order to avoid early death and extinction, organisms developed complex mechanisms to cope with such environmental hazards, including altering the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins to activate pathways that protect against or repair damage.
For example, the biologist Paul Myers of the University of Minnesota has described an animal study in which fish embryos experience non-linear toxicity from alcohol, a toxin that causes severe deformities in zebrafish embryos at high doses and prolonged exposure.
“I’ve done concentration series, where we give sets of embryos exposures at increasing concentrations, and we get a nice linear curve out of it: More alcohol leads to increasing frequency and severity of midline and branchial arch defects. With one exception: at low concentrations of about 0.5 percent alcohol, the treated embryos actually have reduced mortality rates relative to the controls, and no developmental anomalies,” Myers said.
In other words, there appears to be a kind of overcompensation that explains the enhanced protective mechanisms that are elicited by small amounts of a toxin.
Protective mechanisms are activated to a greater degree than would be necessary merely to neutralize the threat, resulting in a net beneficial effect.
There are some epidemiological studies that have been touted as offering real-world illustrations of hormesis in humans, but they have palpable shortcomings.
An excellent analysis of them by surgical oncologist David Gorski was prompted by a US pundit’s outrageous exaggeration of the likely benefits from hormesis in Japan. She declared that “the only good news is that anyone exposed to excess radiation from the nuclear power plants is now probably much less likely to get cancer.”
However, that would only be true for incremental radiation exposures at extremely low levels. In light of what we know now — and even with the data that we are likely to have in the near future — we cannot be certain about the exposures.
Some workers at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant are likely to have received higher doses of radiation (not only of I-131, but also of other, longer-lived, more dangerous radioisotopes, such as Cesium-137) than would activate a hormetic response.
Last month, three workers suffered radiation burns from highly radioactive water that breached their protective clothing, and people (especially infants or children) exposed to high levels of I-131 before they could be protected by iodine prophylaxis, might well have received cancer-inducing doses.
One thing is certain, at all but extremely low doses — perhaps only slightly higher than background levels — radiation causes cancer.
Beyond that, radiation physics and hormesis are very arcane and complex phenomena, and understanding them requires more than superficial knowledge.
If you want to better understand all the nuances, get a science degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology or the Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule in Zurich. Otherwise, stay tuned, learn from the experts, and don’t jump to conclusions.
Henry Miller is a fellow in scientific philosophy and public policy at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He was a US government official from 1977 to 1994.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past