The earthquake and tsunami related problems at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant have inspired endless commentary and speculation. Unfortunately, much of the debate about the disaster and its implications has been uninformed and problematic.
Radiation levels have increased by as much as 400 times the normal level 19.2km from the plant; increased radioactivity has been found in milk, fish and a variety of vegetables farmed in the region; and drinking water in Tokyo, 225km from Fukushima, has been declared unsuitable for consumption by infants. Several countries have banned imports of milk and vegetables from the affected region.
What are we to make of all this?
Radiation at these levels poses a minimal threat to human health for anyone outside the immediate area of the nuclear power station itself.
Most of the radiation is Iodine-131, which is good news for several reasons. First, this isotope has a short half-life — only about eight days — so it decays to negligible levels in a short time (in 10 weeks, less than 0.1 percent is left).
Second, it indicates that the source of the radiation is the reactor itself, rather than spent fuel rods (which harbor much longer-lived and more dangerous radioisotopes).
Third, a readily available and effective antidote exists for those at risk: non-radioactive iodine, available in tablets or liquid, which blocks the uptake of I-131 into the thyroid gland.
Moreover, limits for radioactivity in food commonly incorporate orders of magnitude of the margin of safety and are predicated on long-term ingestion. In addition, Japan’s limits for radiation exposure are even more conservative (ie, lower) than those set by international agencies.
Another factor that might mitigate radiation damage is a phenomenon called hormesis — a biphasic dose-response relationship in which something such as a toxic heavy metal or ionizing radiation that is harmful at moderate to high doses may actually produce adaptive beneficial effects at low doses.
In other words, we don’t see a completely linear relationship between the dose of the potential toxin and a deleterious effect; rather we see a distribution that looks something like a “check mark,” with concentration on the horizontal axis and some measure of damage on the vertical axis.
Hormesis is a byproduct of evolution. From the beginnings of life on earth, organisms have been exposed to potentially harsh conditions, with individual cells commonly exposed to toxic substances such as chemicals and radiation.
In order to avoid early death and extinction, organisms developed complex mechanisms to cope with such environmental hazards, including altering the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins to activate pathways that protect against or repair damage.
For example, the biologist Paul Myers of the University of Minnesota has described an animal study in which fish embryos experience non-linear toxicity from alcohol, a toxin that causes severe deformities in zebrafish embryos at high doses and prolonged exposure.
“I’ve done concentration series, where we give sets of embryos exposures at increasing concentrations, and we get a nice linear curve out of it: More alcohol leads to increasing frequency and severity of midline and branchial arch defects. With one exception: at low concentrations of about 0.5 percent alcohol, the treated embryos actually have reduced mortality rates relative to the controls, and no developmental anomalies,” Myers said.
In other words, there appears to be a kind of overcompensation that explains the enhanced protective mechanisms that are elicited by small amounts of a toxin.
Protective mechanisms are activated to a greater degree than would be necessary merely to neutralize the threat, resulting in a net beneficial effect.
There are some epidemiological studies that have been touted as offering real-world illustrations of hormesis in humans, but they have palpable shortcomings.
An excellent analysis of them by surgical oncologist David Gorski was prompted by a US pundit’s outrageous exaggeration of the likely benefits from hormesis in Japan. She declared that “the only good news is that anyone exposed to excess radiation from the nuclear power plants is now probably much less likely to get cancer.”
However, that would only be true for incremental radiation exposures at extremely low levels. In light of what we know now — and even with the data that we are likely to have in the near future — we cannot be certain about the exposures.
Some workers at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant are likely to have received higher doses of radiation (not only of I-131, but also of other, longer-lived, more dangerous radioisotopes, such as Cesium-137) than would activate a hormetic response.
Last month, three workers suffered radiation burns from highly radioactive water that breached their protective clothing, and people (especially infants or children) exposed to high levels of I-131 before they could be protected by iodine prophylaxis, might well have received cancer-inducing doses.
One thing is certain, at all but extremely low doses — perhaps only slightly higher than background levels — radiation causes cancer.
Beyond that, radiation physics and hormesis are very arcane and complex phenomena, and understanding them requires more than superficial knowledge.
If you want to better understand all the nuances, get a science degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology or the Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule in Zurich. Otherwise, stay tuned, learn from the experts, and don’t jump to conclusions.
Henry Miller is a fellow in scientific philosophy and public policy at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He was a US government official from 1977 to 1994.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95