To some in Tajikistan, Misha represents a better future. To others, he is in the vanguard of the biggest imperial threat to Central Asia since the Soviet Union collapsed.
Misha, born Wang Shuai, is Chinese. His farming expertise is helping villagers in an impoverished part of southern Tajikistan to earn a living growing vegetables.
The land he farms is also Chinese, temporarily at least, under a landmark deal signed this month to lease 2,000 hectares of Tajikistan to Beijing.
The Tajik government has not released financial details of the land lease terms. It says more such agreements are planned. China says it has no territorial ambitions in Central Asia.
“China has no plans to garrison its people in foreign lands in order to farm undeveloped land,” Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu (姜瑜) said. “Our increasing agricultural cooperation is based on equality and mutual benefit.”
Yet China’s sheer size and its relentless hunger for raw materials to feed its fast-growing economy mean its influence in the vast mineral-rich region is growing fast. Governments in Central Asia have accepted billions of US dollars in Chinese loans in exchange for access to natural resources.
A quarter of Kazakhstan’s oil production is Chinese-owned and Beijing has built a pipeline to pump natural gas from the world’s fourth-largest reserves in Turkmenistan. In Tajikistan, a Chinese company is majority owner of the largest gold mine.
China’s westward expansion across its 2,800km border with Central Asia has inflamed passions within the former Soviet region, where opposition activists say governments are giving up too many of their precious resources.
“This process is capable of stirring up tension within the local population, who perhaps cannot accept such a mass influx of Chinese,” Tajik political analyst Zafar Abdullayev said.
Tajikistan, where the average monthly wage is US$93, is the poorest of the five former Soviet states in Central Asia. Nearly 40 percent of its GDP is derived from remittances sent home by about 1 million migrant workers.
In the capital, Dushanbe, Chinese firms have won contracts to repair roads and construct the national library and new premises for the Tajik foreign ministry.
“My husband works in Russia because he can’t find work here, while the government is bringing in Chinese to build our roads. How can this be right?” asked Zarrina, 35, a Dushanbe resident.
About 6,000 Chinese citizens live in Tajikistan, mainly engaged in building roads and tunnels in the mountainous republic, where arable land is at a premium.
After Russia, China is Tajikistan’s biggest trade partner, with an 18 percent share of the country’s total trade turnover.
Tajikistan also owes China US$700 million, 36 percent of its national debt. Loans from Beijing have been granted with a 20-year repayment period and 2 percent annual interest.
Abdullayev said Tajik President Imomali Rakhmon, like other Central Asian leaders, was using closer ties with Beijing for leverage against ex-Soviet master Russia and Western countries with an interest in the strategic region bordering Afghanistan.
“Beijing’s support is now the main bargaining chip in dialogue between Rakhmon’s government and major world powers,” the analyst said.
Ties were reinforced this year when the two countries agreed to end a century-old dispute over their border high in the Pamir mountains, reaching an accord that evaded both Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union.
While the Tajik foreign ministry heralded the deal to cede only 4 percent of a disputed region the size of Albania as a “great victory” for Tajik diplomacy, opponents accused the government of surrendering sovereign territory.
The Tajik government believes Chinese farming expertise will improve productivity and revitalize the rural communities that are home to three-quarters of the country’s 7.5 million people.
Safar Safarov, first deputy chairman of the ruling People’s Democratic Party of Tajikistan, said such projects would boost food security in a country that imports 30 percent of its grain.
“It’s practically impossible right now to find agricultural produce from Tajikistan in our markets,” he said. “We need to feed and water our own people.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US