To some in Tajikistan, Misha represents a better future. To others, he is in the vanguard of the biggest imperial threat to Central Asia since the Soviet Union collapsed.
Misha, born Wang Shuai, is Chinese. His farming expertise is helping villagers in an impoverished part of southern Tajikistan to earn a living growing vegetables.
The land he farms is also Chinese, temporarily at least, under a landmark deal signed this month to lease 2,000 hectares of Tajikistan to Beijing.
The Tajik government has not released financial details of the land lease terms. It says more such agreements are planned. China says it has no territorial ambitions in Central Asia.
“China has no plans to garrison its people in foreign lands in order to farm undeveloped land,” Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu (姜瑜) said. “Our increasing agricultural cooperation is based on equality and mutual benefit.”
Yet China’s sheer size and its relentless hunger for raw materials to feed its fast-growing economy mean its influence in the vast mineral-rich region is growing fast. Governments in Central Asia have accepted billions of US dollars in Chinese loans in exchange for access to natural resources.
A quarter of Kazakhstan’s oil production is Chinese-owned and Beijing has built a pipeline to pump natural gas from the world’s fourth-largest reserves in Turkmenistan. In Tajikistan, a Chinese company is majority owner of the largest gold mine.
China’s westward expansion across its 2,800km border with Central Asia has inflamed passions within the former Soviet region, where opposition activists say governments are giving up too many of their precious resources.
“This process is capable of stirring up tension within the local population, who perhaps cannot accept such a mass influx of Chinese,” Tajik political analyst Zafar Abdullayev said.
Tajikistan, where the average monthly wage is US$93, is the poorest of the five former Soviet states in Central Asia. Nearly 40 percent of its GDP is derived from remittances sent home by about 1 million migrant workers.
In the capital, Dushanbe, Chinese firms have won contracts to repair roads and construct the national library and new premises for the Tajik foreign ministry.
“My husband works in Russia because he can’t find work here, while the government is bringing in Chinese to build our roads. How can this be right?” asked Zarrina, 35, a Dushanbe resident.
About 6,000 Chinese citizens live in Tajikistan, mainly engaged in building roads and tunnels in the mountainous republic, where arable land is at a premium.
After Russia, China is Tajikistan’s biggest trade partner, with an 18 percent share of the country’s total trade turnover.
Tajikistan also owes China US$700 million, 36 percent of its national debt. Loans from Beijing have been granted with a 20-year repayment period and 2 percent annual interest.
Abdullayev said Tajik President Imomali Rakhmon, like other Central Asian leaders, was using closer ties with Beijing for leverage against ex-Soviet master Russia and Western countries with an interest in the strategic region bordering Afghanistan.
“Beijing’s support is now the main bargaining chip in dialogue between Rakhmon’s government and major world powers,” the analyst said.
Ties were reinforced this year when the two countries agreed to end a century-old dispute over their border high in the Pamir mountains, reaching an accord that evaded both Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union.
While the Tajik foreign ministry heralded the deal to cede only 4 percent of a disputed region the size of Albania as a “great victory” for Tajik diplomacy, opponents accused the government of surrendering sovereign territory.
The Tajik government believes Chinese farming expertise will improve productivity and revitalize the rural communities that are home to three-quarters of the country’s 7.5 million people.
Safar Safarov, first deputy chairman of the ruling People’s Democratic Party of Tajikistan, said such projects would boost food security in a country that imports 30 percent of its grain.
“It’s practically impossible right now to find agricultural produce from Tajikistan in our markets,” he said. “We need to feed and water our own people.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers