The strongest earthquake ever measured in Japan — at 8.9 on the Richter Scale — struck off the coast of northeastern Honshu on Friday and was followed by a massive tsunami. Thousands of people are reported dead and tens of thousands are missing, as the number of people reported injured keeps rising. The earthquake destroyed buildings and bridges, and the tsunami drove as far as 10km inland, washing away houses, cars and roads in its path. Factories caught fire, transportation and communication lines were broken and at least one nuclear reactor exploded in Fukushima Prefecture, setting off a partial meltdown.
These disasters have caught the world’s attention, and Taiwan, one of Japan’s closest neighbors, must show its concern by providing practical relief and reconstruction assistance.
The disaster is also a warning for Taiwan, where earthquakes are frequent. The Japanese quake, with its epicenter off the coast of Miyagi Prefecture, was 256 times stronger than the 921 earthquake that caused devastation in Taiwan’s Nantou County early on Sep. 21, 1999. Many people are now wondering whether our disaster prevention system and relief mechanisms could handle an earthquake of this magnitude. In this respect, we can learn a great deal from the way Japan has handled its latest disaster.
First, Japan’s excellent earthquake early warning system gave a one-minute warning via text messages and a public broadcasting system, and this allowed many people to get out of danger, cutting the number of casualties.
Second, the Japanese authorities frequently hold earthquake response exercises. The well-practiced government departments were quick to respond and ordinary people got themselves out of danger in an orderly manner instead of panicking, which would have only worsened the losses. Those who had no vehicles, food or shelter lined up for supplies and transportation or to be assigned a temporary place to stay. Shops and hotels made no attempt to profit from the disaster, instead giving away food and drinks or offering accommodation free of charge. The Japanese public are to be admired for their self--control and politeness.
Japan’s state broadcaster, NHK, issued non-stop tsunami and aftershock warnings, calmly offering advice as to how to get out of danger. Experts were on hand to help people get the fullest possible understanding of what was going on and how best to respond.
In contrast, many Taiwanese news outlets have focused primarily on scenes of devastation, along with commentary from the same old pundits who have opinions on anything from politics and economics, to crime and natural disasters. Evidently, news reporting in Taiwan has not matured beyond the stage of infotainment.
Taiwan, like Japan, sits on the earthquake belt that runs all around the Pacific Rim and it has an average of 18,500 earthquakes, felt and unfelt, each year. Taiwan would do well to observe and learn from the way the Japanese government and public have responded to their quake disaster. The tsunami and explosion at the Fukushima nuclear power plant have both given Taiwan cause for alarm. Our government immediately convened an interdepartmental disaster response conference to discuss how the Japanese quake might possibly affect Taiwan and what to do if the wind dumps radioactive dust on our territory. At the level of passive response, the government has acted quite quickly, but a plan for a disaster alarm and information system is still on the Cabinet’s drawing board.
With no single department dedicated to disaster prevention and response, our rescue and relief resources cannot be effectively integrated. Next time Taiwan is hit directly by a natural disaster, it may be more than we can handle.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS