The strongest earthquake ever measured in Japan — at 8.9 on the Richter Scale — struck off the coast of northeastern Honshu on Friday and was followed by a massive tsunami. Thousands of people are reported dead and tens of thousands are missing, as the number of people reported injured keeps rising. The earthquake destroyed buildings and bridges, and the tsunami drove as far as 10km inland, washing away houses, cars and roads in its path. Factories caught fire, transportation and communication lines were broken and at least one nuclear reactor exploded in Fukushima Prefecture, setting off a partial meltdown.
These disasters have caught the world’s attention, and Taiwan, one of Japan’s closest neighbors, must show its concern by providing practical relief and reconstruction assistance.
The disaster is also a warning for Taiwan, where earthquakes are frequent. The Japanese quake, with its epicenter off the coast of Miyagi Prefecture, was 256 times stronger than the 921 earthquake that caused devastation in Taiwan’s Nantou County early on Sep. 21, 1999. Many people are now wondering whether our disaster prevention system and relief mechanisms could handle an earthquake of this magnitude. In this respect, we can learn a great deal from the way Japan has handled its latest disaster.
First, Japan’s excellent earthquake early warning system gave a one-minute warning via text messages and a public broadcasting system, and this allowed many people to get out of danger, cutting the number of casualties.
Second, the Japanese authorities frequently hold earthquake response exercises. The well-practiced government departments were quick to respond and ordinary people got themselves out of danger in an orderly manner instead of panicking, which would have only worsened the losses. Those who had no vehicles, food or shelter lined up for supplies and transportation or to be assigned a temporary place to stay. Shops and hotels made no attempt to profit from the disaster, instead giving away food and drinks or offering accommodation free of charge. The Japanese public are to be admired for their self--control and politeness.
Japan’s state broadcaster, NHK, issued non-stop tsunami and aftershock warnings, calmly offering advice as to how to get out of danger. Experts were on hand to help people get the fullest possible understanding of what was going on and how best to respond.
In contrast, many Taiwanese news outlets have focused primarily on scenes of devastation, along with commentary from the same old pundits who have opinions on anything from politics and economics, to crime and natural disasters. Evidently, news reporting in Taiwan has not matured beyond the stage of infotainment.
Taiwan, like Japan, sits on the earthquake belt that runs all around the Pacific Rim and it has an average of 18,500 earthquakes, felt and unfelt, each year. Taiwan would do well to observe and learn from the way the Japanese government and public have responded to their quake disaster. The tsunami and explosion at the Fukushima nuclear power plant have both given Taiwan cause for alarm. Our government immediately convened an interdepartmental disaster response conference to discuss how the Japanese quake might possibly affect Taiwan and what to do if the wind dumps radioactive dust on our territory. At the level of passive response, the government has acted quite quickly, but a plan for a disaster alarm and information system is still on the Cabinet’s drawing board.
With no single department dedicated to disaster prevention and response, our rescue and relief resources cannot be effectively integrated. Next time Taiwan is hit directly by a natural disaster, it may be more than we can handle.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS