Last month, Japan’s Statistics Bureau released preliminary figures gathered from its most recent population census which showed that the population at the end of October was 128.05 million, up a mere 0.2 percent from the previous census in 2005. These figures show that Japan’s population is growing at the slowest pace since it started conducting censuses in 1920.
The main reason for the slowdown in population growth is the falling birthrate. The Japanese Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, worried about the future supply of labor and the burden of looking after the elderly, has announced various incentives to encourage childbirth.
In Taiwan, the Department of Health and the Council for Economic Planning and Development have been doing the same thing. However, the way the government has been talking about the falling birthrate is not entirely in keeping with the real situation, and some of the policies it has come up with have been criticized as being hastily drafted to accommodate popular opinion.
Although the falling birthrate will result in fewer babies for obstetric departments to deliver and fewer patients for pediatric departments, encouraging more people to have babies is not the right way to come to these departments’ assistance. Medical technology can be transferred to other departments, or reinvested in areas with poor access to healthcare. Besides, medical education does not have to be so narrowly specialized and departmentalized. The government could start off by making adjustments in the training of young doctors.
The average age at which people get married for the first time has risen by more than five years in Japan and Taiwan. It should also be borne in mind that divorce rates and the proportion of women who never marry change over the years. So when people employ simple statistical definitions to make comparisons between different countries and then deduce that the fertility rate for women of childbearing age in Taiwan is the lowest in the world, such results should be interpreted with caution.
The number of babies born in Taiwan has been falling for the last four decades. Last year, fewer than 170,000 babies were born — only about 40 percent of the all-time high. However, this gradual fall is partly because of the ebb of the post-war high tide of childbirth, or the baby boom. Another factor is that, following the move of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government and its armed forces from China in 1949, there were more men than women in Taiwan. In those early years, this gender imbalance had the impact of lowering the average age at which women got married, which in turn pushed up the birthrate.
These days the gender balance is very nearly even. This, combined with the later age at which women get married now that they enjoy greater economic independence, naturally means that they have less opportunity to bear children.
While advances in science and technology, and improvements in healthcare and hygiene, have prolonged life expectancy, they have also greatly increased labor productivity, so that it is easier to provide for the material needs of society’s elder members. It is not necessary, therefore, to have more manpower available to ensure that the elderly are properly cared for.
Those who say that women of childbearing age ought to have 2.1 babies each, on average, in order to sustain population growth are out of touch with reality. Data from the EU’s 27 member countries show that, except when large numbers of refugees emigrate because of war, women of childbearing age only need to have an average of 1.4 babies each, such as is the case in various southern European countries, to sustain a gradual increase in the population. When the fertility rate is about 1.7, with the added factor of a flexible and open immigration policy, that is sufficient for the population to grow quite quickly, as it has in western and northern European countries.
Finally, it is nonsense to blame the stagnation of Japan’s economy over two decades on its aging population. Indeed, it is this mindset that has led to Japan’s policy of expanding fiscal expenditure and made it the most heavily indebted among developed nations. It is true that young people are active consumers, but they are not the only ones. In an aging society, companies that want to increase their revenue must pay more attention to older consumers. In an aging society, sales that rely solely on fashionable goods and creating a buzz are sure to fall, and profits that rely purely on capital borrowing and capital remuneration will also drop. However, if businesses invest more in improving the quality of their manpower and in accumulating intellectual property, they will have more business opportunities and make more profit.
In considering and dealing with the problem of low population growth, the government and concerned parties can gain a more comprehensive view of the issue if they pay more attention to the following key points — forecasting changes in women’s desire to have children; interpreting childbirth figures based on the understanding that the rise in childbearing age is a temporary phenomenon and is based on the length of the adjustment period; analyzing the impact of the increasing numbers of people who are not yet married or will not marry at all; how to encourage people to get married and have children; the fact that changing population trends in Taiwan and Japan are quite similar, including the gender ratio of children under 14 years of age, the current birthrate, the fertility ratio of women of childbearing age and, finally, the fact that more women aged 35 years and older are giving birth to babies.
Lu Hsin-chang is a professor at National Taiwan University’s Department of International Business.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US