Wake up call
A shocking political event took place recently when the Philippine government deported 14 Taiwanese fraud suspects to China. The Philippine government treated the Taiwanese as Chinese, and this is a serious mistake. According to the principles of the San Francisco Peace Treaty and international law, Taiwan is not part of China. Sovereignty over Taiwan does not belong to China.
On Dec. 12, 2006, Shigeru Oda, a prominent jurist and former international court of justice judge, published a paper in the Japan Academy in which he wrote: “Taiwan is not part of the PRC [People’s Republic of China] in the past, and is not part of the PRC right now either.”
He also said that “beyond verbosity, the so-called ‘Taiwan Independence’ is Taiwanese becoming independent from the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] of the Republic of China [ROC], and has absolutely nothing to do with the Beijing regime.”
My late husband, C.C. Yang (楊建成), a former vice minister of economic affairs, published an article entitled “I am Taiwanese, not Chinese” in the Liberty Times on June 27, 1997, and also held the same view.
The origins of this incident can be traced back to April 28, 1952. When the San Francisco Peace Treaty came into force, Taiwanese officially lost their Japanese citizenship. According to the Treaty of Peace between the ROC and Japan, which came into force on Aug. 5, 1952, Taiwanese were forced to accept ROC citizenship. At that time, the advanced “nationality option” was not offered to the residents of Taiwan and Penghu.
The Treaty of Peace was abrogated when Japan established diplomatic relations with the PRC on Sept. 29, 1972, but the citizenship of the Taiwanese was not re-assigned or even mentioned.
On April 7, 2009, a US court ruled that the “People of Taiwan are stateless.” For the past 60 years, Taiwanese have been living in political purgatory. This is the tragic fate of Taiwanese. Currently, Taiwan is ruled by the exiled government of the ROC, but the whole world has the false impression that Taiwan is part of China. This is totally inconsistent with the historical facts and principles of international law.
If the Philippine government’s actions become a model for how the international community treats Taiwanese, this will result in overseas governments threatening to “repatriate” Taiwanese to China if they breach local laws. That will create a major threat to the safety and dignity of Taiwanese.
Faced with this, it is time for the people of Taiwan to wake up.
Many Taiwanese consider -themselves citizens of the ROC, but no one else in the world agrees with the existence of the ROC. That’s the reason the Philippine government sent the Taiwanese suspects to the PRC. Currently, the US refers to “Taiwan” as the “Taiwan authority,” not as a country.
The people of Taiwan need to unite, identify with Taiwan, draw a line with the ROC and declare to the world their desire to establish an independent state according to international law.
This is the only way to preserve our dignity and maintain our international status.
This is the only way Taiwan will ever have the authority to negotiate with other countries’ governments, and finally, dare to hope that the US under international law and the Taiwan Relations Act will lead the way for Taiwan to become a true nation.
Yang-Liu Hsiu-Hwa
Taipei
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
The Honduran elections seem to have put China on defense. The promises of trade and aid have failed to materialize, industries are frustrated, and leading candidate Salvador Nasralla, who has increased his lead in the polls, has caused Beijing to engage in a surge of activity that appears more like damage control than partnership building. As Nasralla’s momentum has grown, China’s diplomacy, which seems to be dormant since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 2023, has shown several attempts to avoid a reversal if the Liberal or the National party — which also favor Taipei — emerge as winners in the
RSS