What better time to talk about reproduction than in the Year of the Rabbit?
In a report delivered last week to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee, Minister without Portfolio James Hsueh (薛承泰) reiterated what is already common knowledge: Taiwan’s birthrate is one of the lowest in the world and continues to drop, from 8.29 births per 1,000 people in 2009, to 7.21 last year.
Indeed the rate of decline has itself accelerated so much that officials have had to revise the projection for when the population will actually start to shrink. In 2008, it was estimated that Taiwan would reach zero growth in 2026; now it is 2022.
The consequences of such trends are entirely negative. For one, a declining birthrate ages the population, increasing the percentage of elderly that must be supported by those still working. Currently 10.74 percent of Taiwan’s 23 million people are over 65, well above the 7 percent at which a society is defined as “ageing” by the WHO.
Just as important as the ratio of workers to non-workers is the quality of the workforce itself. Young workers tend to be better educated and more proficient with new technology. They are also more ambitious, innovative and willing to take risks. So even an aging population that remains healthy and productive will not compensate for a decline in new blood entering the system.
Last month, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called the dwindling birthrate a national security issue and ordered his administration to begin making plans. However, what these have amounted to so far is less than impressive. Among Hsueh’s proposals was that the government should give out honeymoon vouchers and promote having children through popular TV programs such as soap operas.
Instead of criticizing such a lackluster response, Ma applauded the suggestions and added that committee members should themselves have more children. He also said that all programs should be fast tracked because next year is the Year of the Dragon, an auspicious year in the Chinese zodiac for having babies.
Such solutions to population decline verge on idiotic. Indeed, the sheer ineptitude of the government’s response increases the problem by heightening one of its main causes, which is that people anxious about the future are less likely to make the kind of long-term commitment of time, money and energy that child rearing represents. What does it say for Taiwan’s future when the president looks to soap operas and the zodiac to resolve national security issues?
More substantial measures have been proposed, most involving cash incentives for having children. However, these are either too meager or too short-term to have a serious effect. All are band-aid responses to a problem that calls for broad-based, even visionary solutions. They are also incentives aimed at the lowest income levels of society, leaving out a middle class that increasingly bears the burden of rising costs, stagnating salaries and declining job prospects.
Could it be that deep down, Ma believes that Taiwan’s birthrate is just one more problem that will be resolved through closer ties with China? Unfortunately, thanks to a combination of Beijing’s one-child policy and a preference for boys, China’s demographic outlook is even worse than Taiwan’s.
If Taiwan is going to avoid demographic disaster, it must develop policies that are generous and long term. These policies must also address the problem in terms that are more than purely economic — and more than reproductive. In addition to consulting the zodiac, Ma may wish to look at countries like Australia, Canada and the US, which have managed their demographics more successfully through a combination of social support for families, immigration and planning to keep their aging citizens healthy and productive.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS