What better time to talk about reproduction than in the Year of the Rabbit?
In a report delivered last week to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee, Minister without Portfolio James Hsueh (薛承泰) reiterated what is already common knowledge: Taiwan’s birthrate is one of the lowest in the world and continues to drop, from 8.29 births per 1,000 people in 2009, to 7.21 last year.
Indeed the rate of decline has itself accelerated so much that officials have had to revise the projection for when the population will actually start to shrink. In 2008, it was estimated that Taiwan would reach zero growth in 2026; now it is 2022.
The consequences of such trends are entirely negative. For one, a declining birthrate ages the population, increasing the percentage of elderly that must be supported by those still working. Currently 10.74 percent of Taiwan’s 23 million people are over 65, well above the 7 percent at which a society is defined as “ageing” by the WHO.
Just as important as the ratio of workers to non-workers is the quality of the workforce itself. Young workers tend to be better educated and more proficient with new technology. They are also more ambitious, innovative and willing to take risks. So even an aging population that remains healthy and productive will not compensate for a decline in new blood entering the system.
Last month, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called the dwindling birthrate a national security issue and ordered his administration to begin making plans. However, what these have amounted to so far is less than impressive. Among Hsueh’s proposals was that the government should give out honeymoon vouchers and promote having children through popular TV programs such as soap operas.
Instead of criticizing such a lackluster response, Ma applauded the suggestions and added that committee members should themselves have more children. He also said that all programs should be fast tracked because next year is the Year of the Dragon, an auspicious year in the Chinese zodiac for having babies.
Such solutions to population decline verge on idiotic. Indeed, the sheer ineptitude of the government’s response increases the problem by heightening one of its main causes, which is that people anxious about the future are less likely to make the kind of long-term commitment of time, money and energy that child rearing represents. What does it say for Taiwan’s future when the president looks to soap operas and the zodiac to resolve national security issues?
More substantial measures have been proposed, most involving cash incentives for having children. However, these are either too meager or too short-term to have a serious effect. All are band-aid responses to a problem that calls for broad-based, even visionary solutions. They are also incentives aimed at the lowest income levels of society, leaving out a middle class that increasingly bears the burden of rising costs, stagnating salaries and declining job prospects.
Could it be that deep down, Ma believes that Taiwan’s birthrate is just one more problem that will be resolved through closer ties with China? Unfortunately, thanks to a combination of Beijing’s one-child policy and a preference for boys, China’s demographic outlook is even worse than Taiwan’s.
If Taiwan is going to avoid demographic disaster, it must develop policies that are generous and long term. These policies must also address the problem in terms that are more than purely economic — and more than reproductive. In addition to consulting the zodiac, Ma may wish to look at countries like Australia, Canada and the US, which have managed their demographics more successfully through a combination of social support for families, immigration and planning to keep their aging citizens healthy and productive.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement