Government exists to bring peace and stability to people’s lives. Politics is a vocation, a calling to safeguard a nation’s sovereignty and protect the life, property and security of its citizens. The extradition of Taiwanese to China by the Philippines flouts international convention, highlights the government’s slow, prevaricating, delusional response and exposes an uncomfortable truth. It reveals for all to see the government’s disregard and disdain for the issue of national sovereignty and the legal rights of its citizens. It also shines a harsh light on its ineptitude and dereliction of duty.
International convention dictates that judicial jurisdiction over criminal activity resides first and foremost with the territory in which it occurs. In this case, given that the Philippines chose to forgo its jurisdictional rights based on territory, it should have respected Taiwan’s rights of jurisdiction based on nationality. Any extradition of suspected felons who are Taiwanese should have been to Taiwan. Instead the Philippines chose to ignore this right of jurisdiction, and extradited Taiwanese to China.
With this precedent in place, if at any time in the future Taiwanese become involved in disputes overseas with Chinese nationals, any country can use this instance as a basis on which to send Taiwanese to China. Over time, individual cases have a habit of becoming standard procedure. This will not only seriously damage our sovereignty, it will wreak havoc on the legal rights of our citizens.
The government seems content to say that the Philippines has already expressed its goodwill, and leave the situation at that. That is simply unacceptable. We have to demand that the government take more robust action to address this grave diplomatic dereliction.
There is a proverb to the effect that he who constantly denigrates himself will come to be denigrated by others. Over the last two years the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has consistently kowtowed on issues of national sovereignty, misguidedly believing that if it shows a willingness to deal with China that Beijing will reciprocate. That position is no longer tenable. Recent events have shown it to be a resounding folly.
China is not going to give an inch on issues of sovereignty when it comes to international exchanges and that leaves little if any room for “goodwill.” That much is crystal clear.
Beijing has been pretty consistent about its position in international matters, expressed in three phrases: There is only one China in the world, the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the sole legitimate government representing that China and Taiwan is a part of China. The PRC is not going to move even a little on these issues.
All the more reason for Taiwan, which is quite distinct from the China represented by the PRC government, to highlight the differences between itself and the PRC in every way that it can on the international scene, to shake itself free of the “one China” framework. What we should not be doing is dancing on the international stage to the tune of China’s unification PR machine.
China and the Philippines have ganged up on Taiwan and given our ears quite a boxing. Our national identity has taken quite a bruising and the legal rights of 23 million people have been trampled on. What has the government done? Very little.
To rub salt into the wounds, it is now requiring government departments to be careful when referring to China in official documents and to use such terms as “the other side of the [Taiwan] Strait” or “the mainland.” With this kind of attitude, it is little wonder that Philippines would think nothing of trampling on international convention and Taiwan’s national integrity.
Su Tseng-chang is a former premier.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US