In order to generate the right atmosphere for the Republic of China’s (ROC) centennial, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in conjunction with different media outlets, has produced a number of television programs to highlight the historical ties between the founding fathers of the ROC, such as Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) and Taiwan. However, these programs are little more than a crude attempt to cover up the fact that a foreign regime rules the nation and they seriously distort Sun’s original intention in supporting the independence of small and weak Asian nations.
By the late 19th century, Taiwan and Vietnam were imperial colonies, and the Qing Dynasty (later the ROC) had basically been demoted to “semi-colonial status” by invading foreign powers. Bullied by the same imperialist powers, Taiwanese, Vietnamese and Chinese patriots were sometimes in contact and even joined each another’s organizations in order to exchange opinions on how to save their nations.
In 1904, the Vietnamese revolutionary leader Phan Boi Chau established a secret society named the Reformation Society, which advocated overturning French colonialism by violent means in order to build a new Vietnam based on a constitutional monarchy. At the time, Japan had gained the upper hand in its war with Russia and the international situation made Phan believe that Japan, which had emerged stronger after the Meiji Restoration, could serve as a model for Vietnam. In 1905, he visited Japan for the first time to learn the secret of this great success.
It was during this visit that Phan met Liang Qichao (梁啟超), a Chinese intellectual who lived in Japan, and Sun, who was visiting. Sun criticized Phan’s belief in constitutional monarchy as being too conservative, saying that a democratic republic would be better.
Sun suggested that small and weak Asian nations should cooperate to help each other achieve independence. He also suggested that Phan encourage the Vietnamese to join the Chinese revolution, pledging to help Vietnam transform into an independent state once the Chinese revolution had succeeded.
Phan, however, suggested that Sun assist Vietnam to achieve its independence first, so that Chinese revolutionaries could then use Vietnam as a base in their fight against the Qing Dynasty.
In order to link small and weak Asian colonies, Sun made trips to Taiwan and Vietnam. The founding father of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh, also visited China on several occasions seeking help. The ROC government even considered Ho a spy for the Chinese Communist Party and imprisoned him for about a year in Guangxi Province. However, he was not the only Vietnamese to play an active role in the Chinese revolution, with the long-term goal of later leveraging China’s strength to secure Vietnamese independence.
Some media outlets have intentionally exaggerated the participation of Taiwanese, such as Weng Chun-ming (翁俊明) and Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水), in the Taiwanese chapter of the Tongmenghui, the precursor of the KMT, in an attempt to create the impression that a meaninfgul number of Taiwanese at that time leaned toward China.
However, the true significance of Taiwanese participation in the Chinese revolution should be seen in terms of how the long-term goal of such individuals was Taiwanese independence, not unification with China.
Chiung Wi-vun is chairman of the Taiwan-Vietnam Cultural Association and an associate professor in the Department of Taiwanese Literature at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past