The legislature on Friday passed an amendment to the Income Tax Act (所得稅法), abolishing — finally — the decades-old tax immunity of kindergarten, elementary and junior-high school teachers and administrators and military personnel.
Under the amendment, the nation’s 29,000 kindergarten teachers and staff members, 207,000 elementary-school and junior-high teachers and administrators and 135,000 military personnel will have to pay taxes on their income starting in 2013.
The Ministry of Finance said the change is expected to bring in NT$1 billion (US$34 million) in tax revenue for the state coffers annually.
The amendment is indeed a breakthrough in terms of tax reform because it is meant to bridge social injustice, but the reform came years too late.
The privilege was granted to these groups of people when the act was written in 1943 and amended in 1955 and 1979, during which time the teachers, school staff members and military officials were not paid as well as employees in the industrial and business sectors.
The introduction of the tax immunity was understandable at the time, but the benefit should have been abrogated when these groups enjoyed relatively higher job stability and much better pay and benefits than the general public as the nation achieved economic prosperity in the 1980s and 1990s.
However, the issue had never been resolved over the past two decades since then-minister of finance Wang Chien-shien took the initiative to draw up plans to cancel the privilege in 1980, largely because of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) predominance in the legislature.
Against this background, it is intriguing to see pro-blue newspapers cheer over the amendment, referring to it as a major achievement of the KMT administration under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) while touching very lightly on the perennial boycott of the reform by the KMT.
It is true the belated passage of the amendment deserves applause, but shouldn’t years of calculations by politicians blinded by electoral gains deserve condemnation?
Imagine how much better the government’s finances would have been if these 370,000 people had paid income tax over the past 20 years.
And let’s not forget that it is the government’s responsibility to ensure social justice, instead of creating a privileged class and remaining idle and indifferent for decades.
So yes, passage of the amendment is praiseworthy, but this still does not account for the failure of the reform to clear the legislative floor years earlier.
Whether or not the Ma administration really means to address the decades-old injustice is still questionable, particularly in the wake of the Executive Yuan’s plan to give the teachers, school staff members and military personnel extra benefits after they begin to pay income tax, including improving the salaries of military officials and lowering the number of classes the teachers have to teach, and after the reinstatement of the 18 percent preferential interest rate for retired public officials.
Ma said during his New Year address that he expects Taiwan to achieve social justice in the next 100 years. During a trip to Pingtung on Saturday, he also said the government needs to push reform step by step against all odds.
If Ma meant what he said, he should make sure the Executive Yuan withdraws the plan and reviews — or better, cancels — the preferential interest rate.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US